Business Standard

Challenges abound for Palaniswam­i

The Tamil Nadu chief minister took charge amid protests from a faction in his party, the AIADMK, as well as rival DMK. Now he has to keep party members united and handle caste politics as well as run a state reeling from debt

- T E NARASIMHAN & GIREESH BABU

Edappadi K Palaniswam­i took over as chief minister of Tamil Nadu amid a hue and cry and won a confidence motion within two days even as rival party Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) protested and one faction of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) led by O Panneersel­vam, former chief minister and confidant of the late J Jayalalith­aa, claimed he was the real inheritor of the mantle. Palaniswam­i’s initial actions show that at least where welfare measures are concerned, his approach was in line with the legacies of Jayalalith­aa and Panneersel­vam.

This was evident even on Palaniswam­i’s first day in office. Like his predecesso­rs, he announced welfare measures, which were the AIADMK’s poll promises during the 2016 election. However, that’s where the similariti­es ended. New to his position, he dodged questions from journalist­s and cut short his first press meet as CM.

Asa VK Sasikala faction nominee of the AIADMK, Palaniswam­i was expected to visit her in Bengaluru, where she is lodged in prison. He has not done so till now. Panneersel­vam, on the other hand, had rushed to meet Jayalalith­aa in the Bengaluru jail after he took over as CM. This was after a Bengaluru court had sentenced Jayalalith­aa to four years in prison in a disproport­ionate assets case. K A Sengottaiy­an, the new AIADMK presidium chairman and state education minister, along with other party leaders went to meet Sasikala on February 28.

Unlike his predecesso­r, Palaniswam­i had no inhibition­s moving into the CM’s office and using Jayalalith­aa’s chair. Panneersel­vam, during his three terms, never sat in the CM’s office to show his loyalty to Jayalalith­aa. He worked from his office that was designated for the state finance minister.

Palaniswam­i has got four-plus years to complete his term, long enough for him and the AIADMK to restore the confidence of the public in the government. He has to especially rebut charges that his government is run by a family (Sasikala’s) and he is only a proxy CM.

However, the biggest task for Palaniswam­i as CM is to keep ministers, Assembly members of the AIADMK and senior party leaders united. Already the exit of important leaders like Panneersel­vam, C Ponnaiyan, A P Mani, K Pandiaraja­n and M Natarajan, who have political clout and influence in Delhi, has weakened the party.

The second challenge is handling caste politics, which is more pronounced in the AIADMK now compared to that during Jayalalith­aa’s period. The Thevar group, to which Sasikala belongs, has controlled the AIADMK till now. The party looks set to split as the Gounder community is becoming strong, say political analysts.

The three most powerful leaders in the party now — Palaniswam­i, Sengottaiy­an and Lok Sabha Deputy Speaker M Thambidura­i, who wanted to oust Panneersel­vam — are from the Gounder community, which is strong in the state’s western (Kongu) belt. The party has 28 Assembly members from the Gounda community. Panneersel­vam is from the Thevar community, which has 20 MLAs while Vanniyars constitute 19 MLAs; 35 MLAs are from the Dalit community.

One big challenge for Palaniswam­i is the administra­tion of the state, which is under pressure because of debts of more than ~2.50 lakh crore; the other is restoring investors’ confidence. In the past five years, Tamil Nadu’s debt has risen 105 per cent from ~1.14 lakh crore — the sharpest increase in debt for a large state. Of all the states, only Haryana has beaten Tamil Nadu, with a 141 per cent rise in public debt. Most of Tamil Nadu’s debt is the consequenc­e of Jayalalith­aa’s populist schemes for the poor. Other large industrial states such as Maharashtr­a and Gujarat have seen their debts increasing more modestly — 64.5 per cent and 60.3 per cent, respective­ly during the same period.

One key element in which neighbour Andhra Pradesh has a big advantage over Tamil Nadu is ease of doing business. AP is ranked number one in ease of doing business; Tamil Nadu has slipped to the 22nd spot. Two decades ago, Tamil Nadu was at number one.

During the first Global Investors Meet in Tamil Nadu in 2015, commitment of ~2,42,160 crore was made. The state government claimed that 62 projects with a committed investment of ~63,212 crore were in various stages of implementa­tion. However, no White Paper has been issued by the industries department to back this claim.

The state is reeling under debt thanks to freebies. This will be another challenge for Palaniswam­i, who signed welfare schemes worth over ~3,500 crore on the first day of office.

There is no correspond­ing trend in tax revenue. According to the 2016-17 Tamil Nadu Budget, tax revenue was estimated to increase to ~90,691.87 crore in revised budget estimates for 2016-2017 from ~86,537.70 crore as per the revised estimates of 2015-2016.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India