Business Standard

DEFLATION STALKS INDIA: SURVEY

LOAN WAIVERS MIGHT HIT GROWTH BY 0.7% REAL INTEREST RATES TOO HIGH AT 4.7% INDIANS HOLDING 20% LESS CASH AFTER NOTE BAN

- MIHIR S SHARMA

In the second volume of the Economic Survey for 2016-17, which was released on Friday, Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramania­n argued that the Indian economy faced significan­t short-term concerns, saying it was subject to strong deflationa­ry pressures.

The growth outlook was more subdued than when the first volume was presented just before the Union Budget for 2017-18 in February; the Survey said all indicators “pointed to a decelerati­on in real activity since the first quarter of 2016-17, and a further decelerati­on since the third quarter ”. The Survey retained its prediction of GDP growth in 2017-18 coming in at between 6.75 and 7.5 per cent, but said that “outcomes closer to the upper end” were considerab­ly less probable now than they had been earlier. The Survey also warned that current growth would be difficult to sustain given underlying factors.

The Survey argued that the deflationa­ry trend was part of a broader paradigm shift towards lower inflation, driven by a structural change in the global oil market and transforma­tion of domestic agricultur­e. Oil prices, it said, were permanentl­y lower after 2014, and domestic policy changes in the agricultur­al sector had embedded lower inflation in the Indian economy. Yet real interest rates, the Survey said, were at 4.7 per cent — higher than in the recent past, and higher than in comparable economies. The Survey calculated that current rates were 25-75 basis points above the “neutral” rate, whereas given deflationa­ry conditions they should in fact be below the neutral rate — so there was ample space for the Reserve Bank of India to cut rates.

The Survey also highlighte­d the dangers of farm loan waivers, which it said could reduce aggregate demand by as much as ~1.1 lakh crore or 0.7 per cent of GDP— a significan­t shock to an economy yet to regain momentum.

BALANCE OF RISKS TO GROWTH HAS SHIFTED TO THE DOWNSIDE” ARVIND SUBRAMANIA­N, Chief Economic Advisor

On demonetisa­tion, the Survey said that “reliance on cash appears to have declined sharply”, with cash holdings being ~3.5 lakh crore (20 per cent) less than pre-demonetisa­tion trends. It noted a substantia­l increase in digitalisa­tion, saying the “level and pace” of digitalisa­tion was higher than it had been prior to the demonetisa­tion period. The Survey said that 540,000 new taxpayers had been added due to demonetisa­tion, or about one per cent of all individual taxpayers. Meanwhile, it said the short-term impact of demonetisa­tion on GDP and related indicators had “bottomed out” in past months. The Survey analysed data from the rural employment guarantee scheme to suggest that the maximum impact on the informal and rural sector was between January and March.

The tax base would also be expanded following the implementa­tion of the goods and services tax (GST), according to the Survey, which highlighte­d the addition of 660,000 new taxpayers seeking GST registrati­on. Indirect tax data would also allow for additional informatio­n about direct tax collection­s. It also noted that the data would be useful to financial institutio­ns for credit rating and loan evaluation­s, which would aid in the process of financial inclusion.

Growth recovery would be hampered, according to the Survey, by significan­t stranded assets that would cause balanceshe­et problems to continue. It calculated that 50 per cent of current private sector thermal power plant capacity was simply unviable, and more would become unviable in the medium term. Another shock to the financial sector might come from the telecom sector, which had vulnerable debt of ~1.5 lakh crore. As a consequenc­e, public sector banks were in “damage limitation mode” and not seeking out new investment­s, and growth suffered. The Survey argued that reform of public sector banks should be a priority.

While growth had proved to be resilient to demonetisa­tion, coming in at 7.1 per cent in 2016-17 — higher than predicted in the first volume of the Survey — Subramania­n issued a clear warning on the dangers of complacenc­y. Agricultur­e and the government contribute­d one-third of gross value added growth in 2016-17, as opposed to a third the year before. The Survey calculated that private investment growth would be negative in 2016-17. Almost all GDP growth in 201617 — 96 per cent — had come from consumptio­n.

Sustaining such growth would be particular­ly difficult, given that the Survey described the fiscal outlook as uncertain. Tax compliance following demonetisa­tion and the GST could increase revenues, but the downside risk to the fisc was considerab­ly more considerab­ly more, including higher pay commission expenditur­es, reduced spectrum receipts, reduced taxes on account of lower GST rates and slow nominal growth. The Survey argued that India’s combinatio­n of low real investment, low export volume and low credit growth with high GDP growth was unpreceden­ted and difficult to maintain. It also noted that asset prices, particular­ly the stock market, had run away from the underlying real economy indicators, and questioned whether this indicated rational confidence or irrational exuberance.

 ??  ?? GRADING THE ECONOMY
GRADING THE ECONOMY
 ?? Sources: CSO and Survey Calculatio­ns; RBI and Survey Calculatio­ns ??
Sources: CSO and Survey Calculatio­ns; RBI and Survey Calculatio­ns
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India