Privacy is a fundamental right, says SC
Decision may have a bearing on Aadhaar
Anine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday set aside previous judgments and unanimously declared that privacy was a fundamental right but not an absolute right.
The judgment might have a bearing on the use of Aadhaar, a 12-digit unique identification number, by the Union and state governments for the delivery of welfare schemes, and also on how the state and private entities such as Google and Facebook collect an individual’s personal data.
Though privacy is yet to be defined, citizens can seek remedy from court if they feel their privacy has been breached. The judgment is also likely to open the floodgates for fresh petitions on Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which criminalises homosexuality. “The right to privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 and as a part of the freedoms guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution,” the Supreme Court said in its judgment running into 547 pages.
“A law which encroaches upon privacy will have to withstand the touchstone of permissible restrictions on fundamental rights. In the context of Article 21, an invasion of privacy must be justified on the basis of a law which stipulates a procedure which is fair, just and reasonable,” the court ruled on the petition filed by a retired high court judge, KS Puttaswamy, who had challenged the Aadhaar scheme as violative of the right to privacy.
The judgment is expected to clear the way for a five-judge Constitution Bench that is hearing a clutch of petitions related to the use of Aadhaar — including alleged contempt by the Union and state governments for violating the court’s ruling on not making Aadhaar mandatory for government schemes — and the legal tenability of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016.
The Bharatiya Janata Party-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government had passed the Aadhaar Act as a Money Bill, which is being legally contested by Congress leaders Jairam Ramesh and P Chidambaram in the Supreme Court.
The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), which was set up in 2009 by the previous Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government, has issued Aadhaar numbers to 1.17 billion people after collecting their biometric details.
The UIDAI was set up without legal backing and later Aadhaar was made mandatory by the NDA government for delivering most welfare benefits.
Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley welcomed the judgment and said the Supreme Court was approached on the privacy issue as the UPA government had brought in Aadhaar without passing a Bill in Parliament. He said the right to privacy was a fundamental right but not an absolute one and would be subjected to certain restrictions that were fair, just and reasonable. Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said, “The Supreme Court has affirmed what the government had said in Parliament while moving the Aadhaar Bill. Privacy should be a fundamental right subject to reasonable restrictions.”
However, the government had argued differently before the ninejudge Constitution Bench.
Prasad skirted questions related to the effect of the Supreme Court judgment on government schemes that were being rolled out on the Aadhaar platform and various related issues such as the criminalising of homosexuality and the collection of data by private and government agencies.
Prasad, however, lauded Aadhaar and said the government saved ~57,000 crore by directly transferring subsidies to 300 million Jan Dhan accounts. “Around 30 million biometric authentication take place every day and 320 million mobile SIM cards have been issued based on Aadhaar numbers. Aadhaar is secure and safe,” he said, suggesting that the government would continue with the Aadhaar scheme.
When asked about the collection and usage of personal data by companies such as Google and Facebook and whether it would be seen as infringing a person’s privacy, Prasad said, “India will be a global digital power and we can take good care of our cybersecurity and safety. I am very happy that all the big international companies are coming to India. There is Google, Facebook, WhatsApp... they are all welcome. They are empowering Indians…They will learn to respect the law of the land.”
Chief Justice JS Khehar and three other justices who authored a common judgment asked the government to put in place a robust regime for data protection. “The creation of such a regime requires a careful and sensitive balance between individual interests and legitimate concerns of the state. The legitimate aims of the state would include, for instance, protecting national security, preventing and investigating crime, encouraging innovation and the spread of knowledge, and preventing the dissipation of social welfare benefits,” the ruling added.Though the Union government set up on August 1 a committee under former Supreme Court Justice BN Srikrishna to recommend a framework for securing personal data, it ignored recommendations made by another committee set up under the former chief justice of the Delhi High Court, AP Shah, as a precursor to the Right to Privacy and Data Protection Bill in 2012. The then UPA government, however, failed to bring the Bill in Parliament. The Srikrishna committee has met twice and is expected to submit its report in three months.
Experts said incoming Supreme Court Chief Justice Dipak Misra was expected to set up a new bench to decide whether Aadhaar violated the right to privacy and if the government could make it mandatory for welfare schemes.