Business Standard

Billionair­e owners leave Otkritie fending for itself as Russia swoops in for rescue

- JAKE RUDNITSKY

As Russia’s second-biggest private bank implodes, its billionair­e owners have been conspicuou­s by their absence. By leaving Bank Otkritie to fend for itself, the four shareholde­rs controllin­g more than a third of the company — their combined fortune valued at over $20 billion — may be giving the authoritie­s little choice but to swoop in with a rescue. Now the central bank could be left holding the bag as it considers taking control of the troubled lender amid a run on its deposits.

“Minority owners are less incentivis­ed to provide support,” said Alexander Danilov, a Fitch Ratings analyst. “The magnitude of outflows is too big for them to cover, plus I imagine their wealth is mostly stakes in companies and not cash.”

While private banks have been on the defensive since the regulator began a purge in which over 300 firms have lost their licences, some tycoons have stepped up to keep their institutio­ns afloat. The chief executive of billionair­e Mikhail Gutseriev’s Safmar Group said its B&N Bank may be recapitali­sed by 25 billion rubles ($254 million) this year. In 2004, the owners of AlfaBank provided $800 million as customers pulled funds, stemming the panic.

Otkritie Holding, which controls the bank, has a diverse ownership structure. Two Lukoil PJSC billionair­es, Vagit Alekperov and Leonid Fedun, precious metals magnate Alexander Nesis and entreprene­ur Alexander Mamut own a combined 36 per cent of the group.

Otkritie may be transferre­d to a central bank-controlled fund created to bail out failing lenders, although a final decision hasn’t been made, Vedomosti reported, citing several unidentifi­ed people in the industry. Its debt tumbled into distressed territory after the publicatio­n on Friday, with subordinat­ed bonds due in April 2019 slumping 41.72 cents on the dollar to 50.24 cents.

More often than not, no aid is forthcomin­g for private lenders from their owners. The central bank pulled Jugra Bank PJSC’s license when it found majority shareholde­r Alexey Khotin’s offer to help lacking, despite a challenge from the Prosecutor General’s Office. Tatfondban­k PJSC shareholde­rs held talks with the regulator for more than half a year before it pulled the plug.

Private lenders have already been closing in droves amid a cull by the central bank that’s yanked one in three licenses since 2014. Their state-controlled rivals, with access to cheap funding and a government backstop, have been the biggest winners from the cleanup as many owners balk at resuscitat­ing their under-capitalise­d institutio­ns.

What Otkritie’s billionair­e owners have in common is that they became shareholde­rs as they sought to reduce their exposure to the banking business. Alekperov and Fedun received their 20 percent, held by their US-sanctioned IFD Kapital, after Otkritie agreed to take over a bank founded by Lukoil in 2013.

Nesis and Mamut gained stakes — currently 9.8 per cent and 6.7 per cent, respective­ly — via a similar share swap for their Nomos Bank in 2012. Adding to the complexity is a 10 per cent holding in Otkritie’s parent company owned by state-controlled VTB Group, which also worked on many deals with the bank in the past, including financing its acquisitio­n of Nomos.

BLOOMBERG

Private lenders have been closing in droves amid a cull by the central bank, yanking one in three licences since 2014

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India