Business Standard

A half-hearted attempt

Banks Board Bureau has been made irrelevant


Even though India’s public sector banks, or PSBs, continue to dominate the banking sector, they have been going through a severe bad loans crisis caused primarily by poor governance. The government has taken some steps towards reform, including the formation of a Banks Board Bureau headed by former Comptrolle­r & Auditor General Vinod Rai. The Bureau was entrusted with the task of choosing the top leadership of PSBs and improving governance norms. As such, it would, if properly empowered, have been an important step towards increasing PSBs’ independen­ce and raising their level of competence. However, it is now becoming clear that the Bureau is largely toothless. Given its ineffectiv­eness, and in the absence of any other indication that the government truly wishes to increase PSBs’ independen­ce, it is not clear why the Bureau still exists. It might as well be shut down.

The Bureau was a half-hearted attempt to implement the recommenda­tions of the P J Nayak Committee, which had been set up to examine how the functionin­g and governance of PSBs could be reformed. The main recommenda­tion of the Nayak Committee was to move towards a holding company system, to separate the day-to-day governance and supervisio­n of the banks from the concerns of their ultimate owner, the government. As a first step towards that end, the Banks Boards Bureau was suggested. The Bureau when it was eventually formed did not have the power, as the Nayak Committee had suggested, to oversee all senior appointmen­ts, including board-level choices. It was reduced essentiall­y to recommendi­ng names of the heads of PSBs and financial institutio­ns. Later, even the latter power, to choose the heads of institutio­ns such as IIFCL, IFCI, Sidbi and Exim Bank, was taken away from it and given to the finance ministry.

Subsequent­ly, there have been several instances of its recommenda­tions being simply ignored by the government. Rather than going to the Cabinet for approval, its recommenda­tions are re-scrutinise­d and sometimes overruled by the finance ministry. Its incomplete control over the choice of members of bank boards is also clearly visible. Some new members of boards — “non-official directors” — are also members of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, which calls into question the whole attempt to depolitici­se the functionin­g of PSBs. Other recommenda­tions from the Bureau, such as over the pay of senior PSB executives and an attempt to aid in the resolution of stressed assets, have not met with approval from the finance ministry.

The government began the process of PSB reform with some energy, convening meetings of bank heads and launching the so-called Indradhanu­sh reform programme. However, this has not been followed up by any real action. The one thing it could point to as an improvemen­t, the Banks Board Bureau, has been rendered irrelevant. The government needs to either come up with a real road map for PSB independen­ce and reform or stop pretending that it is making the attempt — and shut down an increasing­ly irrelevant Banks Board Bureau.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India