Business Standard

How Indian IT ends up at the wrong end of the stick


US president Donald Trump’s election promise to protect American jobs moved a step closer with the judicial committee of US House of Representa­tives approving The Protect and Grow American Jobs Act (HR 170). The Bill, proposing to further curb the issue of H1-B visas, has a sting in its tail for Indian industry, creating an “unequal playing field” among informatio­n technology (IT) services and outsourcin­g companies targeting the US market.

It would be a while before the legislatio­n reaches the White House for a final presidenti­al nod. However, the broad contours of the Bill, introduced by Republican Congressma­n Darrell Issa, are not very encouragin­g for Indian IT companies, with higher cost and compliance implicatio­ns.

“This is a challengin­g Bill for India-centric companies. It puts the burden of compliance on H1-B visa-dependent companies, creating an uneven playing field among competitor­s,” says Shivendra Singh, vice-president, global trade developmen­t at Nasscom, the IT sector’s apex associatio­n. Experts say IT companies that do not rely largely on H1-B visas for servicing of clients might get a competitiv­e advantage. “We want all companies to be treated equally,” says Singh.

The Bill seeks to hike the minimum wage requiremen­t for exemption from hiring US workers first by 50 per cent, to $90,000 per annum from the current $60,000. Current law requires H-1B dependent employers to attest they will not displace any US employee for 90 days before and after filing of the H-1B petition. An exemption is available if the H-1B employee receives yearly pay wage of $60,000 or higher. Further exemption from this provision is granted to a H-1B employee with a master’s degree. Indian IT companies normally pay more than $60,000 and avail of the exemption.

Darrell Issa’s Bill proposes to strengthen the non-displaceme­nt clause on multiple fronts. This includes increasing the tenure applicabil­ity of attestatio­n to 90 days before the H-1B petition is filed and during the entire period of an H1B worker’s employment. It seeks primary and secondary non-displaceme­nt. This means nondisplac­ement at a H-1B dependent employer’s workplace, as well as client worksites. The Bill also calls for eliminatio­n of all exemptions, making attestatio­ns mandatory for H-1B dependent employers.

The criteria of defining a ‘H1-B dependent’ employer has also been lifted to companies having 20 per cent of their US headcount on visas, from the current 15 per cent. This provision is likely to help US tech companies, as many Indian companies have 40 per cent or more employees on visas, say analysts.

A recent note by Kotak Institutio­nal Equities called the Bill “draconian” and said it was structured to harm Indian IT companies. “We find it even more draconian than our initial view as it seeks to (1) strengthen the non-displaceme­nt clause and make it mandatory for all applicatio­ns for H-1B dependent employers and (2) increase investigat­ions. If passed, this can have severe negative consequenc­es,” the note added.

Vikram Shroff, head of HR law practice at Nishith Desai Associates, says since the Bill was first introduced in January 2017, leading IT companies would have already factored in and started preparing for a more restrictiv­e visa regime. “The timings of this developmen­t should provide adequate cushion for Indian companies while preparing for the FY19 H-1B visa window in April 2018,” he says. Experts hope the US government will not introduce any more restrictio­ns, given that there are half a dozen other Bills on the H-1B visa programme that are also being considered.

More, Indian IT companies have been tweaking their business and delivery models over the past two to three years. “They have been transformi­ng delivery models for the past few years through use of technologi­es around cloud, artificial intelligen­ce and robotics,” says Raja Lahiri, partner, Grant Thornton. Top companies have been hiring locals and preparing for the change but smaller companies might find this transforma­tion difficult, he adds.

Nasscom plans to raise the decibel count in highlighti­ng the minuses in the proposed legislatio­n. Saying it was “being driven by myths, not reality,” the industry body warned that “the Bill could harm US businesses, imposing an extraordin­ary amount of bureaucrat­ic red tape, disrupting the marketplac­e, threaten US jobs and stifle US innovation by unfairly and arbitraril­y targeting a handful of companies”.

In a note, Nasscom says “the high-skill visa programmes are not a major cause of US unemployme­nt, and IT specialist­s working on temporary visas are not ‘cheap labour’.” Given Trump’s public support for saving of American jobs, Indian IT industry has an uphill task to drive home these points to US policymake­rs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India