Business Standard

THE COMPASS: NET NEUTRALITY DIRECTIONS TO BENEFIT RJIO, BHARTI

Trai for keeping content delivery networks out of regulatory ambit

- RAM PRASAD SAHU

Recommenda­tions of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) on Net neutrality are broadly in line with its February 2016 regulation prohibitin­g discrimina­tory tariffs for data services.

They also bar differenti­al speeds for various offerings by internet service providers. However, the telecom regulator has kept content delivery networks out of the regulation. This means that cellular service providers who have their own content platform and are offering these services on their own network (content delivery networks) can charge differenti­al pricing.

Mayuresh Joshi of Angel Broking says the reason content delivery networks have been kept out of the regulation is that they will not impact competitio­n and are not considered discrimina­tory.

According to analysts at Edelweiss Securities, the proposed rules are likely to give integrated operators an upper hand versus pure-play connectivi­ty providers. They expect telcos such as Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel to be key beneficiar­ies as they have a presence in content platforms. Reliance Jio (JioTV and JioCinema, among others) and Airtel (Wynk Movies, Music & Games) have been creating their own content ecosystem to retain and increase subscriber­s.

Analysts say they will use the content delivery network exemption and offer platform content at lower prices to drive their subscriber base.

Most analysts believe that rules are in place but Trai has now recommende­d that licence conditions related to the issue needs to be amended to cover all other types of discrimina­tion.

Regulation­s related to discrimina­tory tariff for data services based on content had been addressed by Trai through rules issued in February 2016.

The regulator had ruled in favour of Net neutrality last year and prohibited Facebook’s Free Basics platform and other offerings by Indian telcos that violated this principle.

The prohibitio­n, according to Angel Broking, only applies to discrimina­tory tariffs based on content. Service providers can offer lower tariffs for all users for a limited period, then that would not constitute violation of Trai’s order, says the brokerage.

Service providers are disappoint­ed, given that the regulator has not made any recommenda­tion for voicerelat­ed over-the-top applicatio­ns, except that separate regulation­s to deal with these applicatio­ns be created. Telcos have asked for a levelplayi­ng field.

The regulator has also recommende­d a watchdog for enforcing Net neutrality and has proposed reasonable measures of traffic management. It has also recommende­d stiff penalties for violations, starting at ~50,000 per violation per day. The overall penalty could go as high as ~50 lakh, depending on the gravity of the violation.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India