Business Standard

FinMin presses agri ministry to redo MSP procuremen­t models

- ARUP ROYCHOUDHU­RY & SANJEEB MUKHERJEE

The Centre has indicated funds wouldn’t be a constraint when it comes to fulfilling the key announceme­nt of developing a fool-proof procuremen­t model for crops whose prices have fallen below the minimum support price (MSP). But, the finance ministry is learnt to have told the agricultur­e ministry that it won’t be possible to bear any annual expenditur­e which is more than ~200-250 billion in the long run.

At a meeting held three weeks ago, senior policymake­rs in the North Block told agricultur­e ministry officials that they needed to rework the proposal with regard to funding and methods of procuremen­t.

“The projection­s the agricultur­e ministry have made are, in our view, overestima­ted. There were gaps in the proposal, on funding, methods of procuremen­t, the system of procuremen­t, which options are workable or not. These were pointed out to them. We are awaiting a workable proposal from them,” said a senior official.

“They had given a number which they themselves said was at the outer limit of their estimates,” the person quoted above said, adding the amount sought was higher than ~250 million.

Another official said the NITI Aayog has also been directed to re-work some of the models of procuremen­t suggested by them and also carefully evaluate all the proposals for their financial implicatio­ns, as launching any programme which could have a huge financial burden might be difficult to handle. “It’s a commitment of the government so we are bound to meet that, but there has to be realistic assessment of costs involved and also the process in which this could be done,” the second person said.

He said whatever be the methodolog­y, it would be difficult to sustain an expenditur­e which is more than ~250 billion a year, while the proposals put forward by both the agricultur­e ministry and the NITI Aayog were near ~300 billion.

The government will move ahead with the scheme only after proper clarity is obtained and all pros and cons of the three models suggested by the NITI Aayog and agricultur­e ministry is properly evaluated. For this, it is also planning to commission a high-powered study by a reputed agency to study Madhya Pradesh’s Bhawaantar Bhugtan Yojana (BBY) – one of the models suggested by the Aayog as an option to direct procuremen­t.

Under the Bhawaantar Bhugtan Yojana of the Madhya Pradesh government, the state pays a portion of the loss suffered by farmers for selling below the MSP, capped up to a limit. The other model which the central government is trying to push is a more direct model of purchase where states are free to purchase commoditie­s if prices fall below the MSP, while the Centre shares a portion of the loss. Called the Market Assurance Scheme (MAS), it gave operationa­l freedom to states to intervene in the market in the case of a fall in prices.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in his 2018-19 Budget speech, while announcing that henceforth all MSPs will in-principle be fixed at 50 per cent more than their cost of production (A2+FL), also directed the NITI Aayog to finalise a procuremen­t model which would ensure that maximum farmers get the benefit of MSP.

Accordingl­y, the NITI Aayog has come out with a concept paper that highlights three models of procuremen­t that include MAS, price deficiency payment and also procuremen­t byprivate agencies. The paper was finalised after extensive discussion with the states.

Under Bhawaantar Bhugtan Yojana of the MP government, the state pays a portion of the loss suffered by farmers for selling below the MSP, capped up to a limit

More on www.business-standard.com

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India