Business Standard

Numetal’s second bid for Essar valid: NCLAT

ARCELORMIT­TAL ASKED TO CLEAR DUES OF UTTAM GALVA, KSS PETRON CoC WILL CONSIDER ARCELOR’S OFFER IF THE AMOUNT IS PAID

- ISHITA AYAN DUTT & VEENA MANI

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) ruled on Friday that Numetal's second bid to acquire debt-laden Essar Steel was valid and directed ArcelorMit­tal to clear its dues on account of defaulting firms by September 11 to be an eligible bidder, in what appears to be a blow to the LN Mittal-led company.

The appellate tribunal said ArcelorMit­tal India had made a conditiona­l deposit of ~70 billion in its own current account (escrow account), which did not qualify as a payment of the due amount. An offer to repay the debt could not be accepted till it complied with the proviso to Clause (c) of Section 29A unconditio­nally, the NCLAT order said.

The stigma of classifica­tion of the account as non-performing asset (NPA) would continue to be levelled against the promoters of Uttam Galva and KSS Petron, even after the divestment of shares, till the dues were cleared, the order noted.

Section 29A (c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code debars the promoters of an NPA for more than a year from submitting a resolution plan, and the proviso to Clause (c) says a person shall be eligible to submit a resolution plan if payment of all dues with interest is made before the submission of resolution plan.

ArcelorMit­tal said it would review the order before determinin­g its next step.

A spokespers­on for Numetal welcomed the judgment.

“This vindicates Numetal's conviction that it is an eligible bidder and has given a compelling offer to the creditors for Essar Steel’s resolution under the IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code). Numetal welcomes the judgment of the NCLAT bench and reiterates its faith in the judicial system of the country,” the spokespers­on said.

Numetal has offered ~370 billion in its second bid for Essar Steel, which owes lenders around ~490 billion and is undergoing insolvency proceeding­s. ArcelorMit­tal’s second offer is not known. Bids, however, might be revised as the NCLAT order has left scope for negotiatio­ns.

The order said if ArcelorMit­tal deposited the amount in the accounts of Uttam Galva and KSS Petron within the given time, then the committee of creditors would consider its resolution plan along with other offers, including the one submitted by Numetal on March 29, 2018. If necessary, the lenders may negotiate with the resolution applicants, it said.

In the second round, Numetal had dropped Aurora Enterprise­s, of which Rewant Ruia is the ultimate beneficiar­y, to become eligible to bid. Rewant Ruia is the son of Ravi Ruia, a promoter of Essar.

Numetal was also joined by JSW Steel as an investor in a step-down subsidiary in the second round. Vedanta, too, had submitted a resolution plan. Vedanta Resources Chairman Anil Agarwal told television channels on Friday that it welcomed the NCLAT judgment and would leave it to the process to decide the highest bidder.

The resolution profession­al invited a second round of bids for Essar Steel when it found ArcelorMit­tal and Numetal ineligible under Section 29A of the IBC in the first round. ArcelorMit­tal was disqualifi­ed on technical grounds because it had sold its shares in Uttam Galva prior to the submission of bid but continued to be a promoter of the company in the records of the stock exchanges. Numetal was disqualifi­ed on grounds of Rewant Ruia’s exposure in the consortium. However, both parties challenged their disqualifi­cation before the NCLT Ahmedabad bench.

In line with the Ahmedabad bench order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), lenders had given the two bidders time to "cure" their ineligibil­ity.

ArcelorMit­tal had made a conditiona­l offer to lenders that it would have to be declared a successful and eligible bidder for Essar and parked ~70 billion in an overseas branch of an SBI account. Numetal moved the NCLAT to challenge the 30day cure period offered to ArcelorMit­tal. The NCLAT on Friday directed the adjudicati­ng authority to exclude the period the appeal was pending before the appellate tribunal, that is, from April 26 to September 7, 2018 for the purpose of counting the total period of 270 days.

Numetal has offered ~370 billion in its second bid, which owes lenders around ~490 billion

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India