Business Standard

OECD WEAVES NET TO STOP GOOGLE, FB FROM SHIFTING PROFIT

Proposes rules that would provide jurisdicti­ons with a right to ‘tax back’

- DILASHA SETH reports

Digital companies such as Facebook, Google, and Netflix will soon find it difficult to shift profits to low- or no-tax jurisdicti­ons, with the Organizati­on of Economic Cooperatio­n and Developmen­t (OECD) proposing measures to ensure they pay a “minimum level of tax”. The Paris-headquarte­red organisati­on on Friday released a consultati­on paper proposing rules that would provide jurisdicti­on with a right to “tax back” where other jurisdicti­ons have not exercised their primary taxing rights.

Digital companies such as Facebook, Google, and Netflix will soon find it difficult to shift profits to low- or no-tax jurisdicti­ons, with the Organizati­on of Economic Cooperatio­n and Developmen­t (OECD) proposing measures to ensure they pay a minimum level of tax.

The Paris-headquarte­red organisati­on on Friday released a consultati­on paper proposing rules that would provide jurisdicti­on with a right to tax back where other jurisdicti­ons have not exercised their primary taxing rights or the payment is otherwise subject to low levels of effective taxation.

India has been leading the global effort to rework the traditiona­l internatio­nal tax system to make digital firms pay taxes regardless of their physical presence or measured profits in a country.

Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) refers to exploiting gaps and mismatches in tax rules to shift profits by multinatio­nal companies to low-tax regimes. Internet companies operate out of low-tax jurisdicti­ons, but do business in several others, without having a physical presence and end up avoiding taxes.

The Consultati­on on Pillar 1 approach was released last month dealing with re-allocation of profit and revised nexus rules. It explores potential solutions for determinin­g where tax should be paid and on what basis (nexus), as well as what portion of profits could or should be taxed in the jurisdicti­ons where clients or users are located (profit allocation).

The OECD secretaria­t has sought public comments by December 2 on three specific aspects to GLOBE — use of financial accounts as starting point to determine tax base, the extent to which a multinatio­nal company can combine income and taxes from different sources in determinin­g effective tax rate, carve-outs and thresholds that may be considered.

The OECD’S Pillar Two or GLOBE proposals could lead to significan­t changes to the overall internatio­nal tax rules under which multinatio­nal businesses currently operate, said Rajendra Nayak, partner, EY India.

The proposals would, through changes to domestic law and tax treaties, provide jurisdicti­ons with a right to tax back where other jurisdicti­ons have not exercised their primary taxing rights or the payment is otherwise subject to low levels of taxation, he added.

The proposals are i ntended to advance a multilater­al framework that achieves a balanced outcome, limiting the distortive impact of direct taxes on investment and business location decisions, said Nayak.

A public consultati­on meeting on the GLOBE proposal will be held on December 9.

Rakesh Nangia, chairman, Nangia Andersen Consulting, said pursuant to receipt of proposals from the stakeholde­rs, one can expect the OECD to issue the final consensus based solution to tax this new version of world economy.

Addressing the tax challenges of a digitalise­d economy may give options to treaty partners and like multilater­al instrument­s, the matching concept may prevail, said Nangia.

Under Pillar 2, four rules are being discussed — the income-inclusion rule, the undertaxed payments rule, the switchover rule, and a subject-to-tax rule.

The income-inclusion rule aims to tax the income of a foreign branch or a controlled entity if that income was subject to tax at an effective rate that is below a minimum rate. The undertaxed payments rule would operate by way of a denial of a deduction or imposition of source-based taxation (including withholdin­g tax) for a payment to a related party if that payment was not subject to tax at or above a minimum rate.

 ??  ?? Internet companies operate out of low-tax jurisdicti­ons, but do business in several others without having a physical presence and end up avoiding taxes
Internet companies operate out of low-tax jurisdicti­ons, but do business in several others without having a physical presence and end up avoiding taxes

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India