Business Standard

‘Boycott call for Chinese products a childish pique’

- RATHIN ROY Director, NIPFP

RATHIN ROY, director of the National Institutio­n of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP), will step down from his position in August, after a seven-year stint. In an interactio­n with Arup Roychoudhu­ry, he speaks on the reasons for his resignatio­n and his plans. Roy, who has also been a former advisor to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, says India will have to chart a plan to produce goods at a lower cost if it hopes to compete with China, instead of a ‘childish pique’ of boycotting Chinese products. Edited excerpts:

Is it just a coincidenc­e that your resignatio­n comes at the same time as the appointmen­t of Urjit Patel as chairman?

The stepping down of Vijay Kelkar as chairman and appointmen­t of Urjit

Patel, and my decision to resign are completely separate events. Dr Patel is a very worthy successor to Dr Kelkar, and I cannot think of anyone better to lead the institutio­n and he has my full support. He is a man of great internatio­nal stature, a former Reserve Bank of India governor, and most importantl­y, he has been a known friend of NIPFP. If anything, it is a negative that I am resigning at a time when I could have worked with Dr Patel.

Are there any particular reasons for this decision?

I have felt that I need to move on to new profession­al challenges and

“YOU HAVE TWO OPTIONS: EITHER YOU ACCEPT THAT YOU ARE GOING TO BECOME A MORE EXPENSIVE COUNTRY, OR YOU PUT IN PLACE A PLAN TO PRODUCE THE THINGS YOU TAKE FROM CHINA MORE CHEAPLY”

responsibi­lities, which would allow me to focus more on the policy work I do in advocacy, without the simultaneo­us need to manage a public institutio­n and to be able to think and speak for myself. I have had to temper my individual views as they are inevitably associated with the views of the institutio­n. Essentiall­y, it is a question of whether NIPFP can survive as a public finance and research body whose principal clients are the central and state government­s.

As a public figure in policymaki­ng circles, you have been quite frank with your assessment and criticism. Are there things you want to say, which in your current position is prevented you from saying?

There are two rules to follow. You speak on issues and not on personalit­ies. And when you speak about problems, you offer solutions. I think I have met both these criteria. I, however, have other things to say which go beyond the remit of the NIPFP as a public finance and macroecono­mic institutio­n. I believe a number of problems which India is facing today are not problems of this or that government.

Coming to macroecono­mic issues, they say with crisis comes opportunit­y. Are there any reforms you would liked to have seen in the Covid pandemic and the resultant economic crisis?

I don’t believe that with crisis comes opportunit­y. When crisis comes, you deal with the crisis. In the process of dealing with it, you may get some opportunit­ies. In 1991, dealing with the balance of payments crisis forced the then government to undertake liberalisa­tion. I don’t think the situation is the same today. We have to deal with a crisis of a negative GDP growth for certain in FY21, both nominal and real.

The Prime Minister has called for ‘Aatmanirbh­ar Bharat’, and the recent tensions have led to calls to boycott Chinese goods. Can we actually do that?

We are not buying Chinese goods today out of any love for China.

Why are even our sewing needles manufactur­ed in China? We are not able to manufactur­e even lowend products as cheaply as China. And therefore, it is a rational economic decision to buy something from somewhere when it is sold as cheaply as possible. If you choose not to do that, then your economy becomes more expensive and then your growth falls, and you lose. You have two options: Either you accept that you are going to become a more expensive country, or you put in place a plan to produce the things you take from China more cheaply.

What are your plans for the future?

I would like to stay in India and am in conversati­on with people, largely in the private sector. I also have concrete offers from overseas, which I am contemplat­ing.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India