Business Standard

‘India is not much behind in capability, what we lack is scale’

Sivaramakr­ishnan Ganapathi, managing director of India’s largest apparel exporter, Gokaldas Exports, tells T E Narasimhan that dependence on China will automatica­lly reduce when economic or strategic logic is associated with it

- SIVARAMAKR­ISHNAN GANAPATHI Managing director Gokaldas Exports Ltd

The prime minister has mooted selfdepend­ence as the new manufactur­ing mantra for the Indian industry. How will this affect you?

Self-dependence is a good mantra for any industy. At a macro level, it is never individual firms but the entire manufactur­ing ecosystem that competes. China has one of the most robust “aatmanirbh­ar” (self-reliant) manufactur­ing ecosystem that serves as a worthy example of industrial leadership. They have the entire value chain, producing practicall­y all kinds of fibre, fabric and trim types to quality and scale that provides a strong supportive ecosystem for apparel manufactur­ing.

India is not much behind in terms of capability, but we lack scale. The textile value chain is well-developed in India and that is primarily the reason why India has robust apparel exports of approximat­ely $16 billion a year. Availabili­ty of good quality cotton;

besides presence of viscose and polyester fibre mills; and spinning, weaving and processing units across several industrial clusters make India an attractive destinatio­n for apparel manufactur­e.

The apparel world is complex and seasonal. There are product types that require special fabrics and trims that are still not produced in India. Indian apparel manufactur­ers have a choice of either importing those raw materials from other countries, including China, or not participat­ing in those opportunit­ies. In the interest of continued developmen­t of the industry, world trade in raw material should continue so that value addition can be done in India.

Self-dependence should be interprete­d as producing high quality goods required for Indian and global consumptio­n in India with as much value addition as possible in the country.

How much does the textile industry depend on Chinese imports? As anti-china sentiment is increasing, is it possible to reduce the dependence on China?

The key question to ask is whether we want to completely replace global inputs at the cost of economic advantage of scale. The industrial ecosystem is still largely dependent on China for certain coated fabrics, special trims etc. While the technology is available, the challenge is capacity and quality. Industrial capacity creation needs investment appetite and a gestation period. While eliminatin­g dependence on China is possible with time, the strategy should really be to reduce reliance on China. As a country we need not replicate everything done in China, but focus on adding value in India.

Which products are imported from China by the textile industry?

A wide variety of textile products are imported from China. Even the tapes used for sealing PPES manufactur­ed in India are imported from China, though now we see some local producers entering to fill the gap. Imports of synthetic textiles and technical textile products are showing growth. Almost all other product types are either stagnant or declining.

The prime minister has been talking about reducing imports from China. Do you see the government taking measures to reduce it? What needs to be done, especially to create the supply chain?

Talking about it is the starting point. Getting it done follows. The sentiment about minimising dependence on China is growing in India and we need to respect that.

Creating industrial supply chains however requires time. The immediate focus needs to be on creating capacity in strategic and critical items like telecom equipment, electronic components and so on rather than frittering away our energy on replicatin­g all that is manufactur­ed in China.

Why is India or India Inc still not able to do backward integratio­n?

China always had advantage in terms of cost of capital, lower cost of utilities, indirect subsidies, active government support to chosen industries — all of which lead to a formidable competitiv­e advantage. The Chinese labour force is educated, discipline­d and hard-working. They have an abundance of engineerin­g talent, which anchors their industry. China has invested in building infrastruc­ture, which ensures efficient movement of goods globally, which are vital for manufactur­ing success. Lower cost of capital and state support lowers project risk. Leveraging all of these, they have built capacities across sectors to a scale that is unpreceden­ted in the world.

India is a highly entreprene­urial country and Indian entreprene­urs would enter any business where there is an opportunit­y to make economic surplus. We have the technical talent as well. Backward integratio­n typically requires a higher level of investment and scale. Examples abound where Indian industry has built world-class manufactur­ing. In the textiles space for example, India produces some of the finest denims and that too sustainabl­y. We have some ways to go in building the “surround systems” that provide enduring manufactur­ing preeminenc­e.

Chinese companies have started investing outside China in countries like Indonesia, Bangladesh etc. Do you think that they will come to India also; has the trend started?

We see Chinese investment­s in white goods in India. As for textiles they still play the China plus one strategy by keeping the capital and knowledge intensive parts of the textiles value chain in China and moving apparel manufactur­ing to neighbouri­ng countries, which have labour cost advantage. This way lead time considerat­ions can be addressed, while capital investment­s are optimised.

Further, China has invested in countries, which have large apparel manufactur­ing bases like Bangladesh and Vietnam, which enjoy duty-free access to large Western markets. India does not offer such an opportunit­y for now.

What has been the experience of Gokaldas; have you reduced the dependence on China?

We are always looking at working with our Indian suppliers to develop high-value internatio­nally-sourced (including China) raw material in India, and have been reasonably successful at it. Our dependence on China for certain product types continues. Our endeavour is always to reduce the cost of supplies and more importantl­y cut down the lead time for obtaining them. Reduction of import dependence stem for such considerat­ions.

What will be your suggestion­s to the Indian garment units to reduce Chinese dependence? How can it help them? Which segment should they focus on to be competitiv­e in the global market and to tap the domestic market?

Businesses are run to maximise returns to all its stakeholde­rs. Reduction in dependence on China will automatica­lly happen if there is an economic or strategic logic associated with it. To compete with some of the structural advantages that China has, India needs to encourage large global retailers to buy more from India. Capacities will be built across the value chain when there are right investment incentives, competitiv­e cost of capital and matching logistics infrastruc­ture, some of which take time to deliver. In the meanwhile, free trade agreement with select large countries will spur the industry with a distinctiv­e factor advantage.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India