Business Standard

RBI firm on no bank licence to India Inc

Regulator sees threat to financial stability

- HAMSINI KARTHIK

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has stuck to its traditiona­l stand of restrictin­g large corporates from promoting banks.

In informal discussion­s with the government in the context of the new privatisat­ion policy that is in the planning stage, the RBI has communicat­ed its stand on the matter, sources familiar with the developmen­ts said.

The NITI Aayog had recently recommende­d to the government that long-term private capital should be allowed into the banking sector. It also suggested giving banking licences to select industrial houses with the caveat that they didn’t lend to group firms.

The regulator’s main concern is that if large business houses take a controllin­g stake in banks, tracking the money trail and its end-use

might become challengin­g. Also, despite adequate checks and balances and a tight corporate governance framework, companies may still find ways to bypass the system which, in turn, can have huge ramificati­ons for the financial stability of the banking sector.

Ashvin Parekh, an independen­t financial consultant, said allowing large corporate houses into banking might destabilis­e the financial system.

The RBI, it is believed, has effectivel­y closed the option by suggesting that if large business houses were to be allowed to operate banks, the entire conglomera­te’s financials must also come under the central bank’s scrutiny. This suggestion has not found favour and, hence, the question of allowing large corporate houses into banking will not materialis­e, the sources said.

Most developed countries, too, have moved away from the model of banks being owned or controlled by large business houses, especially after the 2008-09 global financial crisis.

This has also been a considerat­ion for the RBI to veto the NITI Aayog’s proposal on the matter, said another person aware of the developmen­t. Instead, it is gathered that the regulator is open to having a widespread institutio­nal ownership in banks to decentrali­se powers and decision-making and enhance corporate governance.

Another important reason for the RBI to turn down the suggestion was that the idea could set a bad precedent.

“Once a license is made available to a business house, others will follow. We cannot be favourable to one and reject the others,” the person said.

Last year, Indiabulls Housing’s proposal to merge with Lakshmi Vilas Bank did not get the regulatory nod, which, according to some, could be due to the group’s diverse business interests, mainly in the real estate sector. Barring Indusind Bank, promoted by the Hinduja group, which received its banking licence in 1994, there are no large banks owned or controlled by business conglomera­tes in India. In 2013, when the RBI called for banking licence applicatio­ns, several business conglomera­tes, including the Aditya Birla group, Larsen and Toubro, and Shriram Capital, had applied. But only IDFC Bank (now IDFC First Bank) and Bandhan Bank made the cut.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India