Business Standard

Bad Boy Billionair­es tells stories all too familiar

- DHRUV MUNJAL New Delhi, 7 October

Perhaps it was only fitting that a docuseries on four of India’s most notorious billionair­es got off to such a controvers­ial start. Bad Boy Billionair­es on Netflix was slated for release on September 2, but was pushed back after two of the subjects in question, Sahara Chairman Subrata Roy and Satyam founder Ramalinga Raju, approached the courts and got a stay on the release. The episode featuring Raju is still under wraps, but the other three — including Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi — became available earlier this week.

By nature, biographic­al documentar­ies have always been a bit peculiar: Filmmakers often pick out famous personalit­ies as their muses and attempt to recreate their life and times despite so much already being available on them. That’s where, in addition to previously unseen footage, new informatio­n acquires colossal importance. Without it, such films turn into prosaic primers on people with otherwise beguiling characters.

That was always going to be the challenge for Bad Boy Billionair­es, the arduous nature of which becomes apparent in the first episode itself. Mallya’s life story is so fabulously famous that it was going to take Sherlock-like acuity to unearth anything unknown to the general public. Predictabl­y then, we’re fed with stories about his “flamboyant” lifestyle, much of which was typified by boundless ambition and a penchant for extravagan­t parties.

The financial shenanigan­s of all three businessme­n are retold through people close to them. In Mallya’s case, there are testimonie­s by childhood friend and entreprene­ur, Kiran Mazumdar-shaw, former Kingfisher Airlines President Alex Wilcox, columnist Shobhaa De and designer Manoviraj Khosla.

From the interviews emerge interestin­g details about Mallya’s younger days: His passion for motorsport — as a kid, he owned a battery-operated toy Ferrari — as well as his fast, reckless lifestyle, which he had to alter after his father’s sudden death. There are also rare images from Mallya’s near-fatal helicopter ride in 2003, with the visuals of the interview in the incident’s immediate aftermath revealing the real “King of Good Times”: A man increasing­ly in awe of his own infallibil­ity.

His son, Sidhartha Mallya, also makes an appearance, but instead of strongly countering the allegation­s against his father, he sticks to vague assertions like “they needed a political pawn” and “a man to be made an example of ”.

But perhaps the most distressin­g part here is Mallya’s voyeuristi­c streak. Even as anguished former employees of the doomed Kingfisher Airlines — thousands of them unpaid for months — speak about their travails, Mallya is shown throwing an obnoxiousl­y expensive bash for his 60th birthday, which also witnessed a performanc­e by Enrique Iglesias.

At the end of which, you can only view Mallya as someone who simply couldn’t help himself, drunk on the myth of invincibil­ity and making rash business decisions as a result, the highlight of which was the foolhardy call to buy Air Deccan.

In terms of newness, the second episode, based on diamantair­e Nirav Modi, is far more watchable. Modi’s delinquenc­ies are fairly recent, and some of the visuals make for gripping viewing. The journalist­ic commentary on this one — most notably the ever-eloquent James Crabtree — does a fine job of breaking down how Modi, along with uncle Mehul Choksi, duped Punjab National Bank of over ~11,000 crore. Sadly, though, there is just a passing mention of Choksi, who now holds Antiguan citizenshi­p.

While the episode on Mallya relies on archival footage, Modi’s is more like a series of news reports, many of which are annoyingly repetitive. But director Johanna Hamilton — each episode has a different director — deserves credit for putting forth an empathetic portrait of Modi. By interviewi­ng women workers from his Surat workshop, Hamilton showcases a businessma­n not accused of financial fraud, but a caring jeweller who helped change the lives of thousands of people seeking employment.

Even as the section on Modi comes with its share of Bollywood and Hollywood A-listers, Netflix has reserved the most entertaini­ng bits for the final episode. The World’s Biggest Family is a riveting, if greatly disturbing, take on Roy and his Sahara empire. Roy’s backstory — it all started with him asking farmers to invest in his company in an Uttar Pradesh village in 1978 — gets you hooked immediatel­y, setting the ball rolling for a scam that went unchecked for decades.

Roy’s tale is unique because he was never really in the business of running a company — he enjoyed a cultish appeal where he allegedly swindled the poor and hapless of their hard-earned money. Through powerful storytelli­ng and sharp imagery, director Nick Read provides an immaculate dissection of Roy’s hubris.

When viewed together, it’s safe to say that this docuseries has a lot in common: the three billionair­es’ hefty ambition, dangerous arrogance and untrammele­d power. But above all, it exposes the fault lines in India’s fragile financial and political system: how officials are corruptibl­e, banks often ignorant and politician­s largely indifferen­t.

It also underscore­s how the Mallyas and Modis of this world may not be the most scheming offenders around. They are the only ones who’ve come to light — the worst may yet follow.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? The docuseries underscore­s how the Mallyas and Modis of this world may not be the most scheming offenders around
The docuseries underscore­s how the Mallyas and Modis of this world may not be the most scheming offenders around

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India