Business Standard

Google tax: US IT, steel lobbies back action against India

- DILASHA SETH

America’s top tech lobby — Internet Associatio­n — has backed retaliator­y tariff action against India, if New Delhi does not roll back the ‘unilateral and discrimina­tory’ equalisati­on levy or Google Tax.

It has also urged the US to help build a global consensus around developing a modern, fair, and global approach to taxing digital services to prevent such unilateral measures from countries like India.

The Steel Manufactur­ers Associatio­n in the US has also strongly backed imposition of retaliator­y tariffs against India to address concerns related to unfair trade practices by Indian steel producers. It sought inclusion of over 200 additional tariff lines related to the steel sector in the retaliator­y tariffs proposal.

Meanwhile, jewellers and jewellery associatio­ns in India and the US have strongly opposed a US proposal to impose tariff, arguing that this will result in diversion of trade to China besides having a major impact on small and medium enterprise and artisans.

In its comments to the US Trade Representa­tive (USTR) over the retaliator­y tariffs propos- al, the associa- tion, which represents over

40 of the world’s leading internet companies, including Linkedin, Netflix, Microsoft, and Google, expressed hope that the central government will roll back this discrimina­tory tax before any escalation occurs.

The Biden administra­tion has threatened India with retaliator­y tariffs of up to 25 per cent ad valorem on a slew of Indian products, including shrimp, basmati rice and gold, among others, over the 2 per cent equalisati­on levy on e-commerce operators introduced in April 2020. It is applicable on non-resident digital entities with a turnover of ~2 crore. It had invited comments on the proposal on retaliator­y tariffs.

“It is the goal of the digital industry for India to end its discrimina­tory tax before any additional duties would enter into force. Thus, the proposed duties will not have to be put into place,” the associatio­n said in the comments to USTR ‘s proposal, the window for which closed on April 30. The public hearing on the matter is on May 10.

Gems and Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC) has, in its comments, objected to the proposed tariffs on the sector arguing that it will cause severe harm to Indian and US businesses.

About 17 of the 40 product lines in the proposed tariff list pertain to the gems and jewellery sector.

“Our sector had earlier been significan­tly impacted with the abrupt withdrawal of the generalise­d source of preference (GSP) benefits. We are now deeply disturbed with the threat of further action against our niche sector,” the associatio­n said. It urged the USTR to remove all 17 heads related to the gems and jewellery sector from the proposed tariffs list. This would help prevent diversion of trade to other countries ‘especially to China.

SEEPZ Gems & Jewellery Manufactur­ers’ Associatio­n said that the proposed action will impact India’s and US economies. “The only beneficiar­y would be China,” it said.

American jewellery, leather, apparel and footwear associatio­ns have also opposed retaliator­y tariffs against India as it will make imports expensive, impacting their businesses.

The 40 sub-heads proposed for tariffs include Rattan furniture (a type of furniture) and parts, precious stone articles, gold rope necklaces and neck chains, cultured pearls, yarn, cigarette paper, and corks and stoppers.

India's collection from equalisati­on levy nearly doubled to ~2,035 crore in 202021 from ~1,138 crore in the previous year.

The Biden administra­tion has threatened India with retaliator­y tariffs of up to 25% ad valorem on a slew of Indian products, including shrimp, basmati rice, and gold

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India