Business Standard

RSS balm for Infosys after Panchajany­a’s diatribe

- ADITI PHADNIS New Delhi, 5 September

AS AN INDIAN COMPANY, INFOSYS HAS A SIGNIFICAN­T CONTRIBUTI­ON

IN THE PROGRESS OF INDIA... PANCHAJANY­A

IS NOT A MOUTHPIECE

OF THE RSS”

SUNIL AMBEKAR, COMMUNICAT­IONS CHIEF, RASHTRIYA SWAYAMSEVA­K SANGH

The Rashtriya Swayamseva­k Sangh (RSS) on Sunday distanced itself from an article published in Panchajany­a ,a journal championin­g Hindu cause, that attacked Infosys over glitches in the income tax portal. The clarificat­ion by Sunil Ambekar, All India prachaar pramukh (communicat­ions chief ) of the RSS, activists said, may have come after “somebody in the government” flagged the matter.

In its September 5 edition, Panchajany­a had a four-page cover story on Infosys — Saakh Aur Aghaat (Reputation and Damage), with its cofounder Narayana Murthy’s picture on the cover page. The article in the weekly — which supports the cause taken up by the RSS, and sometimes goes beyond them — said there were accusation­s that the Infosys management was “deliberate­ly trying to destabilis­e India’s economy”. It dubbed the Bengaluru-based company “unchi dukaan, phika pakwaan (great cry and little wool)”.

It also questioned Infosys’ political linkages (its co-founder Nandan

Nilekani had a Cabinet minister’s rank as UIDAI chairperso­n in the Manmohan Singh government) and charged that the company may have been part of an “anti-national” conspiracy to hurt India’s economic interests and give the Narendra Modi government a bad name. That Panchajany­a carried the report suggested the RSS had endorsed it. However, the organisati­on that describes itself as a “sociocultu­ral body” in which at one time Prime Minister Modi was an activist (pracharak), on Sunday said it had nothing to do with the article.

To set the record straight, the RSS came out with a reproof to Panchajany­a. “As an Indian company, Infosys has a significan­t contributi­on in the progress of India,” Ambekar said.

“There may be some issues regarding the portal operated by Infosys but the articles published in this context in Panchjanya are the personal views of the author. Panchajany­a is not a mouthpiece of the RSS and the said article or opinions expressed in it should not be linked with the Sangh," RSS communicat­ions chief Sunil Ambekar added.

Sangh insiders said the attack on Infosys may have been motivated by its workers and activists who see themselves as “more Hindu” than some members of the government.

After Ambekar’s clarificat­ion, there was no response from Panchajany­a or others on the board of Bharat Prakashan, the company that is the printer and publisher of Panchajany­a, despite several messages. On Saturday, PTI reported Panchjanya editor Hitesh Shankar as saying that Infosys is a big firm and very crucial works were given to it by the government based on its credibilit­y.

With glitches continuing on the I-T Department’s new e-filing portal, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had given project vendor Infosys time until September 15 to resolve issues being faced by taxpayers.

A ginger group that has dedicated itself to purging the system of persons who have had linkages with past Congress and Left-influenced regimes is likely responsibl­e for the attack on Infosys, insiders said. “In the past there have been instances of this group simply posting past comments of people who have been appointed to important positions. Some of these campaigns have resulted in appointees resigning in days. Itne wicket gir gaye to unhe laga, chalo, koi bada wicket giraayen (After they managed to get many wickets, they may have thought, let’s try for a big one),” said an activist.

“The fact that the BJP lauds and grants lucrative government posts to those spewing venom against it 24x7 should speak volumes about how little the party cares about its followers and workers. Any other party of Left-liberal institutio­ns will never even give the courtesy of hearing those from the opposite end of the spectrum, forget about giving out a highpaying job” said one tweet from the group.

It is not clear at what level the government complained to the Sangh, eliciting a response on the Infosys matter. “It might have been B L Santhoshji (organising secretary who is from Karnataka), or someone at an even higher level. It is also possible that someone spoke to Mohanji (Mohan Bhagwat, RSS chief ). We don’t know. The motivation behind the Panchajany­a article was misuse of public money – but also an assertion,” said an activist.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India