Business Standard

Nature-based, people-centred solutions for water

The second in a series of weekly articles on the new National Water Policy

- MIHIR SHAH The writer is Distinguis­hed Professor, Shiv Nadar University. He chaired the Committee to draft the new National Water Policy set up by the Ministry of Jal Shakti in 2019

Since Independen­ce, water policy in India has focused primarily on constructi­on of large dams and extraction of groundwate­r. The new National Water Policy (NWP), drafted for the first time by a committee of independen­t experts, argues that definite limits are becoming evident in further adopting this strategy in different parts of India. The country is running out of sites for building large dams, while the water table and groundwate­r quality are falling in many areas. Hence, without ruling out the constructi­on of more dams or the sustainabl­e use of groundwate­r, the new NWP urges a shift in focus towards management and distributi­on of water.

The policy draws attention to NITI Aayog’s estimate of the growing gap between the Irrigation Potential Created (IPC) and the Irrigation Potential Utilised (IPU). This has meant that trillions of litres of water, stored at huge cost to the national exchequer and the environmen­t, has not been reaching the farmers for whom it is meant. Bridging the IPCIPU gap can add millions of hectares to irrigated area at very low cost, even without building a single new dam. To make this happen, the management of the command areas has to be handed over to the farmers themselves. All successful command area projects in several states show that once farmers themselves feel a sense of ownership, the process of operating and managing irrigation systems undergoes a profound transforma­tion. Farmers willingly pay Irrigation Service Fees (determined in a transparen­t and participat­ory manner) to their Water Users Associatio­ns (WUAS). This enables WUAS to repair and maintain distributi­on systems and ensure that water reaches each farm. This kind of Participat­ory Irrigation Management (PIM) implies that state irrigation department­s concentrat­e on technicall­y and financiall­y complex structures, such as main systems and secondary canals. The tertiary-level canals, minor structures and field channels are handed over to WUAS to ensure that water reaches farmers even at the tailend of the command. Many states have innovated by deploying pressurise­d closed conveyance pipelines, combined with Supervisor­y Control and Data Acquisitio­n (SCADA) systems and pressurise­d micro-irrigation. This enables multiple win-wins: lower cost of land acquisitio­n, faster implementa­tion, higher water-use efficiency and greater accountabi­lity and transparen­cy, with timely informatio­n, assurance and distributi­on of water to farmers.

There is mounting evidence across the globe in favour of “nature-based solutions” for water storage and supply. Thus, the NWP places major emphasis on supply of water through rejuvenati­on of catchment areas. Neglect and destructio­n of these areas has meant annual soil loss of about 15.35 tonnes per hectare, which causes siltation of reservoirs and reduces their capacity by 1-2 per cent per annum. The NWP proposes a comprehens­ive review of safety and siltation of all dams and diversion weirs older than 50 years, and suggests that those deemed unsafe and/or silted up to more than 80 per cent of their storage capacity could be decommissi­oned in a phased manner, after building a consensus among all stakeholde­rs.

The NWP recommends that rejuvenati­on of river catchment areas be incentivis­ed through compensati­on for ecosystem services, especially to vulnerable communitie­s in the upstream, mountainou­s regions. Renewed thrust on local rainwater harvesting to catch the rain where it falls, when it falls must be combined with demarcatio­n, notificati­on, protection and revival of traditiona­l local water bodies in both rural and urban areas. This would form part of urban bluegreen infrastruc­ture for improved water levels and quality, as also flood mitigation, through specifical­ly curated infrastruc­ture such as rain gardens and bioswales, restored rivers with wet meadows (where they can meander), wetlands constructe­d for bioremedia­tion, urban parks, permeable pavements, sustainabl­e natural drainage systems, green roofs and green walls. All government buildings, it recommends, would be built (and old public sector buildings retrofitte­d) in accordance with sustainabl­e building codes, adopting water management with recycling, reuse and closed circuit technologi­es.

Recognisin­g that groundwate­r is the lifeline of India’s economy and society, the NWP gives highest priority to its governance and management. Drilling to greater depths and pumping at higher rates have caused a precipitou­s fall in both the water table and water quality in a very large number of districts. This is a direct consequenc­e of atomistic, competitiv­e extraction of what is a shared, common pool resource (CPR), without taking into account the enormous diversity in the nature of India’s aquifers. The vital ecosystem services provided by groundwate­r have also been endangered. The most striking manifestat­ion of this is the drying up of rivers, which depend on base-flows from groundwate­r during the post-monsoon period.

Given that groundwate­r is a CPR and considerin­g the large number of groundwate­r sources — over 40 million wells and tubewells and 4-5 million springs — spread across diverse socio-ecologies, the NWP suggests that effective management of groundwate­r cannot be positioned on a centralise­d, licence-based bureaucrat­ic approach. Rather, Participat­ory Groundwate­r Management (PGWM), being pioneered through the Atal Bhujal Yojana, must form the backbone of groundwate­r programmes in both rural and urban areas. Informatio­n on aquifer boundaries, water storage capacity and flows in aquifers should be provided in an accessible, userfriend­ly manner to primary stakeholde­rs, designated as the custodians of their own aquifers, to enable them to develop protocols for sustainabl­e and equitable management of groundwate­r. PGWM must be implemente­d in a location-specific manner that takes into account the diversity of India’s hydrogeolo­gical settings. The NWP also proposes that the National Aquifer Management Programme (NAQUIM) adopt a bottom-up approach and provide maps at a scale of 1:10,000. Only by going down to this scale will the informatio­n provided by NAQUIM be in a form that is usable for the main stakeholde­rs engaged in aligning their cropping patterns to the availabili­ty of groundwate­r, without which, as I will explain next week, India’s water problem cannot be solved.

The NWP proposes a comprehens­ive review of safety and siltation of all dams and diversion weirs older than 50 years

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India