Business Standard

Rescuing companies before it is too late

- Nair is director, National Institute of Securities Markets. Sahoo is distinguis­hed professor, National Law University, Delhi. The views are personal

People invented companies in search of immortalit­y; the companies would live and carry on their legacy. Kongo Gumi, a Japanese company engaged in the constructi­on of temples, lived 1,429 years. There are a few 1,000-year-old companies still around. They are rare, surviving gems of a bygone era. The average life of an S&P 500 company has declined from 90 in 1935 to 18 years in 2016, according to a Mckinsey & Co report. Recent studies indicate that the average life of a publicly-traded company, considerin­g acquisitio­ns, mergers, and bankruptcy, is about 10 years. Clearly, the longevity of companies is in danger today.

Companies are modern engines of growth. As Colin Mayer describes, they house, feed, clothe and employ us. They hold the hope of prosperity for posterity. They often have organisati­onal capital over and above their liquidatio­n values. The closure of a company destroys hope and organisati­onal capital. It takes years of effort to bring up a company, which can replace an existing one. Premature death of companies can destabilis­e the economy.

The life of a company has three enemies. First is the enemy within. A company is an amalgam of many stakeholde­rs. Each stakeholde­r has a unique objective function, with a distinct set of rights, interests, and the level of engagement with the company. The interests of one stakeholde­r may conflict with those of another and/or of the company. Stakeholde­rs may work at cross-purposes, and even against the interest of the company. Shareholde­rs’ drive to maximise their upside while enjoying limited liability may expose the company to unlimited liabilitie­s. Examples, the Bhopal gas tragedy and the Satyam fiasco. Many shareholde­rs hold shares for a fraction of a second, with little interest in the life of the company. This begs the question: Whose company is it anyway?

The State has prescribed certain institutio­nal norms — independen­t directors, key managerial personnel, regulation of related-party transactio­ns, protection of minority interest, financial and secretaria­l audit, timely and accurate disclosure­s about material matters, taxes and subsidies, corporate social responsibi­lity, collective­ly referred to as corporate governance — to safeguard the lives of companies. These balance the interests of stakeholde­rs and subordinat­e their interests to those of the company. The immediate shareholde­rs must go beyond the minimum corporate governance norms to ward off any danger to the life of a company.

The second and the most fatal enemy is competitio­n. It is the State policy to stimulate competitio­n and innovation, and eliminate anti-competitiv­e conduct for higher growth. A company, however, loses life when it fails to compete with its peers in the industry for reasons such as poor organisati­on, inefficien­t management, and malfeasanc­e, among others. It also loses life when its business becomes unviable for reasons such as innovation, change in policy, change in social taste, or even black swan events like Covid-19. Creative destructio­n often destroys more companies than it creates! Strategies of resilience, adaptation, research and developmen­t, and the like, minimise the threat to life. It is left entirely to the immediate stakeholde­rs to build muscle of the company to withstand the onslaught of competitio­n and innovation.

The State, however, provides an insolvency resolution process to rescue a company. It has conferred extraordin­ary powers on creditors of a company: (a) they can take or cause a haircut of any amount to any or all stakeholde­rs in order to rescue a company; (b) they seek the best resolution plan from the market, unlike earlier mechanisms that allowed them to find a resolution only from existing promoters; and (c) the resolution plan can provide for several measures that may rescue the company. The resolution plan may entail a change of management, technology, or product portfolio; acquisitio­n or disposal of assets, businesses, or undertakin­gs; restructur­ing of organisati­on, business model. Yet many companies may be beyond repair, which have to be closed. It is for the shareholde­rs to have strategies to prevent stress in the company and for the creditors to rescue it in time.

The third enemy is unfair battles in the marketplac­e. For example, a company that does not have the financial muscle to sell its product below cost, cannot survive in a market where a dominant player resorts to unfair pricing. The competitio­n law prohibits predatory pricing. Similarly, a company cannot survive if its cost of capital is high compared to another company that manipulate­s the market for its securities. Securities laws regulate the capital market to prevent any kind of manipulati­on.

A company that dutifully pays corporate tax cannot survive if another company in the same business dodges taxes. Federal taxes are often bigger than the profit-after-tax margin. If one cheats on goods and services tax, mining royalties, or income tax, it completely alters the competitiv­e landscape, making it difficult for honest companies to survive. The rule of law is the antidote against these enemies. The State must ensure the rule of law and level the playing field to shield companies from such unfair battles. Everyone, including the State, must pay dues of vendors in time. The State must also ensure contract enforcemen­t that brings certainty to business processes and outcomes.

The raison d’être of a company is that it must generate value and share the same among stakeholde­rs, forever. It can do so only if it lives.

 ?? ?? CKG NAIR & M S SAHOO
CKG NAIR & M S SAHOO

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India