Business Today

BANK FRAUDS

HERE’S THE LOWDOWN ON YOUR RIGHTS IN CASE YOU FALL VICTIM TO A FRAUDSTER.

- by Renu Yadav

Narendra Pal, a government school teacher in Zirakpur near Chandigarh, got the shock of his life when he received an sms just before midnight that Rs 10,000 has been withdrawn from his account through an ATM in Surat. By the time he could realise what was happening, he got two more messages about withdrawal of Rs 10,000 and Rs 20,000. He had fallen victim to online fraud. As the first debit happened a few minutes before 12 midnight, the fraudster was able to transact again immediatel­y as withdrawal limit for the next day set in.

As more and more people use online banking services, which are now reaching the unbanked under the financial inclusion programmes of the government, banking frauds are rising. Also, post demonetisa­tion, there has been a sharp rise in online transactio­ns. Pal informed his bank about the transactio­ns immediatel­y by calling on the helpline number. He also wrote to the bank branch and the RBI that he had not shared details of his bank account and ATM card with anyone. He also filed a complaint with the crime branch's cyber cell. The officers took him to the petrol pump where he had last used the card but nothing came out of it. Pal says the bank staff was cooperativ­e but still it took him more than two months and two-three visits to the branch to get his money. He had to forgo the interest.

People like Pal need not worry now. The RBI has come

out with guidelines that say the bank will have to make good the entire loss if the customer notifies it about the unauthoris­ed/fraudulent transactio­n within a stipulated period. The RBI has taken forward the draft guidelines on customer liability in case of online fraudulent transactio­ns that it had issued in August 2016.

ONUS ON BANK

While earlier, the onus was on the customer to prove that he or she has not shared his bank details with anyone, now it is the bank that has to prove that the customer was at fault and not careful enough while using online banking facilities. The earlier system used to result in the customer suffering losses or the bank taking long to pay the money as there were no clear guidelines or stipulated period for refunds. “Many people are apprehensi­ve about online transactio­ns. These guidelines will build trust among bank customers,” says Kalpesh J. Mehta, Partner, Deloitte Haskins and Sells. “The limited customer liability was there earlier also but now the RBI has come out with more specific guidelines which will be helpful for customers,” says Vikram Babbar, Partner, Fraud Investigat­ion & Dispute Services, EY India.

This is a big step, believes Mahesh Patel, President and CTO, AGS Transact Technologi­es, as this will encourage banks to use better fraud monitoring systems.

“As the onus was on the customer, the cost of a good fraud monitoring system was more than the cost of actual fraud for banks. As a result of this, barring the top few banks, the rest refrained from investing in fraud monitoring systems,” says Patel. The RBI guidelines ask banks to implement a robust and dynamic fraud detection and prevention mechanism and assess and fill gaps if any.

CUSTOMER TO GET FULL REFUND

Banks will pay for the entire loss in the following cases.

1. When a fraudulent transactio­n has happened due to deficiency or negligence on the part of the bank irrespecti­ve of the fact that the customer has reported it or not.

“A digital transactio­n goes through various intermedia­ry platforms such as the payer bank, the payee bank, the payment gateway, etc, and the transactio­n has to be encrypted. No data should be stored with either of the intermedia­ries but only transferre­d. Therefore, if a fraud

happens during this process, the customer should not be held liable. As per RBI recommenda­tions, the bank will have to refund to the customer,” says Mehta of Deloitte Haskins and Sells.

2) When there is a third-party breach where the deficiency lies neither with the bank nor the customer but with the system somewhere else and the customer notifies the bank regarding the transactio­n within three working days.

For example, last year, the systems of Hitachi Payment Service, to which some banks had outsourced their ATM transactio­n processing, were compromise­d, affecting around 3.2 million cards across banks such as ICICI, SBI, YES and HDFC.

In this scenario, if the customer informs the bank about the fraudulent transactio­n within three working days after receiving the communicat­ion, the bank will have to make good the entire loss to the customer.

LIMITED LIABILITY

Now, the bank has to prove that the customer was not careful while using online facilities

If the fraud has happened due to the negligence of the customer, he or she will have to bear the entire loss till the bank is informed about the transactio­n.

1. If the customer shares confidenti­al informatio­n like ATM PIN, card number, etc, with somebody knowingly or unknowingl­y, he or she will have to bear the entire loss till the bank is informed about the transactio­n.

2) If neither the bank nor the customer is responsibl­e but the fraud has happened due to the fault in the system and the customer informs the bank within four or seven days, the customer liability will be limited to the transactio­n value or Rs 10,000, whichever is less. The limit applies in case of savings bank accounts, credit cards with limit of up to Rs 5 lakh, and current accounts with annual average balance limit up to Rs 25 lakh. If a person informs within three days, the entire amount is paid back. For current accounts, overdraft accounts and credit cards with limit above Rs 5 lakh, the maximum limit is Rs 25,000.

For basic saving bank deposit accounts, that is, nofrills accounts, the limit is Rs 5,000.

3) If there is a delay of more than seven days, the customer’s liability will be decided as per the policy approved by the bank’s board.

Banks convey to their customers who have registered their mobile number and email with banks about every transactio­n through email and sms. Now, the RBI has advised banks to ask for a mobile number if the customer wants to take the online transactio­n facility so that he or she is notified about every transactio­n. The banks may not offer the facility of electronic transactio­ns, other than ATM cash withdrawal­s, to customers who do not provide mobile numbers to the bank. At present, banks charge for the SMS service. However, RBI guidelines do not mention anything about who will bear the SMS charges. At present, the charges are borne by account holders.

REPLY OPTION

Apart from multiple channels like website, phone banking, SMS, email, IVR, a dedicated toll-free helpline, reporting to the home branch, etc, for reporting fraudulent transactio­ns, banks will have to provide the customer an option to reply to an SMS and email alerts. Further, the RBI has directed banks to provide a direct link for lodging complaints, with specific option to report unauthoris­ed electronic transactio­ns on home page of bank’s website.

The fraud reporting system of banks shall also ensure that immediate response (including auto response) is sent to customers acknowledg­ing the complaint along with the registered complaint number. The communicat­ion systems used by banks to send alerts and receive their responses thereto must record the time and date of delivery of the message and receipt of customer’s response, if any, to them. This shall be important in determinin­g the extent of a customer’s liability.

TIMELINE FOR REFUND

After the customer has informed the bank about the transactio­n, the bank shall credit the amount to the customer’s account within 10 working days as per the new guidelines.

Apart from this, in cases where the customer liability is to be decided by the bank’s board, the complaint should be addressed within 90 days and if the board is unable to decide the customer liability, he or she should be compensate­d as per zero liability and limited liability provisions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India