Business Today

WHY INDIA SHOULD BUTTRESS WTO

Restoring the integrity of the multilater­al trading system is in India's interest.

- COLUMN By PRADEEP S. MEHTA & BIPUL CHATTERJEE Pradeep S. Mehta is the Secretary General while Bipul Chatterjee is the Executive Director at CUTS Internatio­nal, a global think- and actiontank on economic policy issues

THE WORLD IS witnessing a dirty trade war with countries, including the US and India, adopting nonsensica­l protection­ist tariffs. This will dirty the already muddy waters at the World Trade Organisati­on (WTO) whose integrity is under siege by the US, without any national gains. The comity of nations has to come forward to ensure that the WTO continues to function effectivel­y.

However, as every crisis beckons opportunit­ies, there is the need for thinking and acting on how to make best out of it. Here India’s role is exemplary as it has tried to buttress its faith in the multilater­al system by calling a miniminist­erial meeting in March after the collapse of the 11th Ministeria­l Conference in Buenos Aires late last year.

It’s a fact that as compared to bilateral/regional/plurilater­al trading regimes, the multilater­al trading system is much better in every which way. Notwithsta­nding a functionin­g dispute settlement mechanism, it operates on a number of non-discrimina­tory principles, which are mainly to the advantage of small trading nations.

Since the WTO’s establishm­ent in 1995, India has benefitted hugely from its participat­ion in this system. It has helped India to more than double its share of global exports in goods and services, create new jobs and reduce poverty. More importantl­y it helped us in undertakin­g crucial domestic reforms in a number of areas. Therefore, restoring the WTO’s integrity and status is in India’s interest. Some pundits have argued that this is possible if there is forward movement in having discipline­s on new issues such as investment facilitati­on, electronic commerce, micro & small enterprise­s, gender, etc.

While it is true that India has huge interest in resolving some remaining Doha Round issues in the areas of agricultur­e and fisheries subsidies, the argument in favour of not engaging on new issues is flawed on several grounds. Most important is the fact that both the global economy and the Indian economy have undergone significan­t changes over the last two decades. For India to develop in future by creating new jobs and income opportunit­ies and play a much greater role in global affairs, it is in our interest to engage in discussion­s on these issues at the WTO.

This is not to say that while agreeing to discuss and/or negotiate new issues at the WTO, there will not be any red lines for India. There are and will be, such as in having special safeguard mechanisms for protecting the interests of our small and marginal farmers, in having more effective special and differenti­al treatments by linking them with our objective of achieving the Sustainabl­e Developmen­t Goals, and in preserving the sanctity of the WTO’s dispute settlement system with some reforms as necessary.

In other words, India will not have to make unilateral concession­s to other WTO members. What is needed is constructi­ve engagement on the part of India and other major players in resolving some Doha Round legacy issues and in negotiatin­g new issues by keeping in mind and balancing their role in the delivery on developmen­t.

However, this can happen under a crucial assumption – that the US will not wreck the system by making unjustifia­ble demands, such as complete overhaul of the WTO’s dispute settlement system by taking away its enforcemen­t power.

This is time for India to show its leadership and once-and-for-all dispel a popular notion, particular­ly in the west, that we are not a good sport in trade negotiatio­ns.

 ?? ILLUSTRATI­ONS BY AJAY THAKURI ??
ILLUSTRATI­ONS BY AJAY THAKURI

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India