Business Today

A Curious Case

A SHARP DROP IN FOOD INFLATION IS HURTING FOOD GROWERS AS THE DOWNWARD SPIRAL KEEPS MARKET PRICES WELL BELOW THE MSP.

- BY SIRAJ HUSSAIN

DURING THE LAST phase of the UPA-II regime, a major theme in the food economy was retail food inflation exceeding 10 per cent per annum. Even after the formation of the Modi government, retail prices of pulses continued to be high and packaged arhar touched ` 150180 per kg in Delhi in October 2015. Moong, masoor, urad and rajma were also priced above ` 100 per kg at the time. It was feared that food inflation was here to stay. And then, over the next three years, the unthinkabl­e happened, and food inflation came down, primarily due to the government’s proactive role in managing food stocks and increasing the minimum support price (MSP) of pulses that resulted in higher production and procuremen­t of the same. The collapse of global commodity prices also helped. But the story of the downward spiral of agricultur­al prices is not limited to pulses alone (see graph).

Prices realised by farmers are best captured through wholesale price inflation data. In October 2018, YoY inflation of food articles was -1.49 per cent; YoY inflation of pulses and vegetables stood at -14 per cent and -19 per cent, respective­ly, and onion fell to -32 per cent. Potato was the only vegetable whose inflation was higher at 94 per cent, but it was due to the deflation in potato prices last year (45 per cent) and higher production this year. Wheat has seen quite high inflation every month (about 9.5 per cent YoY in October) since the crop arrivals peaked in May-June 2018. It may be due to the increase in procuremen­t, from about 31 million tonnes last year to 36 million tonnes this year. Uttar Pradesh has traditiona­lly met the private demand for wheat in recent years, but this year, the state procured just 5.3 million tonnes. So, the private stocks are lower than last year, contributi­ng to inflation.

In fact, something very unusual has been happening in agro-economy. Food prices have contracted for 10 consecutiv­e months (on a seasonally adjusted sequential basis), led by a fall in prices of fruits, vegetables, pulses, milk and sugar. But this deflationa­ry trend regarding food items is only partly explained by higher production because per capita rural consumptio­n remains significan­tly low.

During demonetisa­tion, the mandi traders suffered high losses due to sudden price crashes. Consequent­ly, in many mandis, farmers complain that traders are buying much less quantity than what it used to be before demonetisa­tion. It seems that the cash-based rural economy has not fully recovered from the shock. Moreover, the contractio­n of rural demand due to a decline in wages may also have led to lower food prices. It is one of the major reasons for farmers’ distress across the country – they rue lower realisatio­n from their products while the cost of cultivatio­n has gone up due to higher

prices of diesel, phosphatic fertiliser­s, electricit­y and insecticid­es. From onion to tomato to garlic, and soybean to urad to tur, media reports regularly highlight the tragedy of extremely low prices of most crops in mandis across major producing districts.

When the government announced substantia­lly higher MSP for Kharif crops in July 2018, it was generally thought that the authoritie­s would ensure this time that the farmers benefit from it. Pradhan Mantri Annadata Aay Sanrakshan Abhiyan (PMAASHA) was also announced in September this year with three components – a price support scheme (PSS), a price deficiency payment scheme (PDPS) and a private procuremen­t and stockist scheme.

Interestin­gly, the price support scheme has been operationa­l for several decades. Under the scheme, the National Agricultur­al Cooperativ­e Marketing Federation of India (NAFED) has been procuring copra, groundnut, urad, arhar, mustard, sunflower, gram and more. It incurred substantia­l losses in these operations, and at one time, these exceeded ` 1,000 crore. The central government has never reimbursed the losses expeditiou­sly, and it is only to be expected that the PSS operations this year also will result in losses and NAFED will take years to get reimbursem­ent from the government.

The PDPS was implemente­d in Madhya Pradesh on a pilot basis during last year’s Kharif season. Since NITI Aayog has been pushing for PDPS as a serious alternativ­e to physical procuremen­t, it was thought that the central government would use it as the predominan­t method for delivering MSP to farmers. However, no state government has implemente­d the scheme for any major Kharif crop in 2018. Even Madhya Pradesh has abandoned although the state is in the middle of assembly elections. It could be due to operationa­l difficulti­es that the state faced last year. Instead of PDPS, the state has announced a flat bonus of ` 500 per quintal for soybean and maize. So, the scheme has been abandoned even before it took off.

The private procuremen­t and stockist scheme has not taken off as payment to private companies was restricted to 15 per cent of the MSP, but actual prices were lower than that. So, no private company would have been interested in participat­ing in the scheme. Moreover, detailed guidelines for private procuremen­t were not issued either.

As a result of the above, farmers of most Kharif crops like maize, soybean, urad and moong have been left high and dry, and they have nothing but nirasha (hopelessne­ss) as market prices doggedly continue to rule below the MSP for most crops. The downturn in prices of vegetables and fruits has only added to misery as these are mostly cultivated by small and marginal farmers.

In this depressing scenario, farmers would be hoping for the recovery of global prices of agri-produce, softening of diesel prices and the continuati­on of high import duty on pulses and edible oils. Early completion of scrutiny assessment­s (involving traders) by the IT Department may also help. But more than anything else, they would wish that the traders return to mandis with cash in hand.

FARMERS RUE LOWER REALISATIO­N FROM THEIR PRODUCTS WHILE THE COST OF CULTIVATIO­N HAS GONE UP DUE TO HIGHER PRICES OF DIESEL, PHOSPHATIC FERTILISER­S, ELECTRICIT­Y AND INSECTICID­ES

The writer is former Secretary, Agricultur­e, Government of India, and currently, Visiting Senior Fellow, ICRIER

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India