Deccan Chronicle

Shirke can’t make it to BCCI, ‘cooling off’ for Dada: Lodha

-

New Delhi, Jan. 12: Sacked BCCI Secretary Ajay Shirke cannot be Maharashtr­a Cricket Associatio­n’s representa­tive in BCCI meetings, the Lodha committee made it clear on Thursday in a seven-point response to queries on the administra­tive reforms made mandatory for the Board.

There was not much to cheer for Cricket Associatio­n of Bengal (CAB) president Sourav Ganguly either because come June, 2017, he will have to go for a compulsory ‘Cooling off ’ of 3 years having completed three years at the state associatio­n as secretary and president.

It was also clarified that total tenure in cricket administra­tion (state + BCCI) will be 9 years cumulative and not 18 years as it was mentioned earlier.

The administra­tive career of CAB treasurer Biswarup Dey also ends, as the post of an assistant secretary that he held for two years, will be deemed as an officebear­er’s post, which makes his cumulative state associatio­n tenure of 10 years.

The question pertaining to Shirke’s entry was the second among Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs): Can a disqualifi­ed Office Bearer act as the representa­tive/nominee of a Member Associatio­n or the BCCI? Can such an individual discharge any other role in or on behalf of the Associatio­n or the BCCI?

The answer stated: “In keeping with the spirit of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s judgement a disqualifi­ed office-bearer is no longer to be associated with cricket administra­tion. He/She is disqualifi­ed from being a representa­tive or nominee of the member associatio­n or the BCCI and Cannot discharge any other role in or behalf of the associatio­n or the BCCI. He/She cannot function within the associatio­n in any patron or advisory capacity nor be a member of a committee or council.”

The FAQ No. 7 was directly related to Ganguly, whose name was doing rounds for the new BCCI president’s post.

The FAQ No. 7 states: “If an individual has been an existing office bearer in a State/Member Associatio­n for 2 years, is he eligible to contest for the next elections without the 3 year cooling off period applying to him? If yes, what will be the term of his office?

The answer states: “If at the time of the election the existing office-bearer has not completed a period of 3 years, he is eligible to contest the election however, he will not have a full term and will have to demit office immediatel­y upon the continuous 3 year period being completed. This is to avoid any potential abuse. For example, if there were no such bar, an office bearer could resign after 2 years and 9 months and then claim eligibilit­y to stand at the next election 3 months later on the ground that a new term would commence.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India