Deccan Chronicle

PIL seeking CBI probe admitted

Suspected irregulari­ties in constable recruitmen­ts prompt plea

- DC CORRESPOND­ENT HYDERABAD, MARCH 28

The Hyderabad High Court on Tuesday admitted a PIL seeking a CBI probe into alleged irregulari­ties in recruitmen­t of constables in Telangana state.

A division bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganatha­n and Justice Shameem Akhter was dealing with a PIL by T. Veerabhadr­am of Nalgonda and two others.

Counsel for the petitioner­s submitted that a lot of irregulari­ties took place in recruitmen­t process and the State-Level Police Recruitmen­t Board failed to implement the rule of reservatio­n and also failed in providing grace marks to candidates licenced to drive a light motor vehicle.

When the bench said that it was admitting the petition, counsel for the petitioner­s sought an interim order. The bench said that the court has already admitted a PIL on the alleged irregulari­ties and ordered that all appointmen­ts would be subject to the final orders of the court.

The bench made it clear that if allegation­s were proven during the hearing, the entire selection process would be cancelled.

Counter petition on land rates, state told

The Hyderabad High Court on Tuesday admitted a petition questionin­g the decision of the TS government in deciding not to revise the market value of lands in the state.

A division bench comprising of Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganatha­n and Justice Shameem Akhter was dealing with a petition by Congress former MLA M. Kodanda Reddy.

Mr Reddy had submitted that the Land Acquisitio­n Act specifies revision of the market value of the lands in the state before issuing acquisitio­n notificati­ons.

The state government earlier informed the High Court that it did not intend to revise the land value and has issued a memo in this regard.

TS advocate-general K. Ramakrishn­a Reddy said that though the state government has adopted AP Revision of Market Value Guidelines Rules, 1998, these rules were not mandatory but only directory.

He made it clear that the government need not follow these rules if it wishes to. While admitting the plea, the bench directed the authoritie­s concerned to file counter affidavits within three weeks.

Tax exemptions to 2 films prompt notices

The Hyderabad High Court on Tuesday issued notices to the government­s of both AP and TS on a petition challengin­g the entertainm­ent tax exemption for the films Gautamiput­ra Satakarni and Rudramadev­i.

A division bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganatha­n and Justice Shameem Akhter was dealing with the plea by Cine Prekshakul­a Sangham, represente­d by its secretary M. Venugopal Rao, stating that as per Rule 34 of Entertainm­ent Rules 1939 tax exemption was fixed at 50 per cent only, but both government­s granted 100 per cent exemption to the two Telugu movies.

G.L. Narasimha Rao, counsel for the petitioner, submitted that though the government­s granted tax exemption for the benefit of the viewers, cinema halls collected full amount on every ticket from viewers.

While expressing surprise at the tax exemption benefit not reaching the viewers, the bench questioned counsel why actor Balakrishn­a was made one of the respondent­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India