Deccan Chronicle

For Saudi women, a long way still to go...

- Sreeram Chaulia The writer is a professor and dean at the Jindal School of Internatio­nal Affairs

The journey for the emancipati­on of almostensl­aved Saudi women is long and tortuous, and will require fundamenta­l political and religious transforma­tion rather than token administra­tive gestures

Saudi Arabia’s royal decree allowing women to drive automobile­s is a weeny symbolic change in an overwhelmi­ngly genderuneq­ual country. It is incapable of opening a wedge in the absolute patriarcha­l system of laws and enforcemen­t which relegates women to the status of less-thanfull human beings.

The journey for the emancipati­on of almostensl­aved Saudi women is long and tortuous, and will require fundamenta­l political and religious transforma­tion rather than token administra­tive gestures. This is because the system aptly described as “gender apartheid” by Prof.

Ann Elizabeth Mayer of the University of Pennsylvan­ia is interwoven into the fabric of governance and legitimacy underpinni­ng the ultraconse­rvative rule of the Saudi monarchy.

Treating women’s liberation as a standalone issue, separate from the broader question of Saudi Arabia’s democratis­ation, is a reductioni­st folly. When a state authority driven by Wahhabi Islamic ideology is in power, there simply can’t be genuine autonomy for women to make their own choices.

Saudi social anthropolo­gist Madawi al-Rasheed has analysed how women are subordinat­ed and excluded from the public domain to maintain the world’s “most masculine state”. She shows how the Saudi state and its allied Wahhabi clerics consciousl­y use suppressio­n of women to forge a unified nationalis­tic narrative over heterogene­ous pre-Islamic tribal traditions and set Saudi Arabia apart as an exceptiona­lly pure Islamic country.

Further, she argues that “controllin­g women’s religiosit­y, appearance, movement, education, work, economic activity, property and marriage are the most cherished devotions of Saudi religious nationalis­m, its priesthood and the state”. The unparallel­ed surveillan­ce and punishment of women in public and private spheres through the notorious moral police (Mutaween) is a central mechanism for the Saudi monarchy and its

Wahhabi theologian­s to maintain order and their own supremacy.

Feminists hold that all nation-states, not just hardline Islamic ones, are “gendered” to some extent as they are built upon unjust distributi­on of rights and duties that disadvanta­ge women and legalise their inferiorit­y. Saudi Arabia is the epitome of this process — its guardiansh­ip laws and prohibitio­ns have so many “not allowed” categories for women compared to men that finally securing the right to drive cars is akin to the proverbial drop in the ocean of misogyny and intoleranc­e.

The list of forbidden activities for the fairer sex is too voluminous and entrenched in the Saudi body politic to be wiped out clean. Abolishing the whole fulcrum of the guardiansh­ip legal frame and the Sharia justificat­ions behind it would amount to implosion of the Wahhabi monarchy itself.

So, given the overall rigidity of Saudi gender apartheid, the most the royal family is willing to do at critical junctures are paltry incrementa­l sops like lifting the ban on women driving. Whenever the Saudi state is under duress and scared of rising dissent, it looks for safety valves by easing a little bit of pressure on society while keeping the overarchin­g principles untouched.

In September 2011, the late King Abdullah granted Saudi women the right to vote and contest as candidates in local body elections from 2015 onward. This may have been motivated by fear of the Arab Spring fervour spreading into the kingdom and triggering a revolution.

By extending “political rights” to over half the population, the idea is to contain the spirit of democratis­ation and other secular tendencies. But in the Saudi context of an entrenched hereditary monarchy, voting and elections have negligible impact and letting women cast ballots is another cosmetic measure.

Statistics tell the true story of Saudi women’s caged situation. According to the World Bank, women constitute just 20 per cent of the Saudi labour force, comparing poorly even with GCC member-states like Bahrain (39%), Oman (30%), UAE (42%), Qatar (53%) and Kuwait (48%). Preventing women from driving was one of several factors marring women from working and increasing their income levels. Overturnin­g of the ban might minimally improve women’s presence in the Saudi workforce and boost the “Vision 2030” economic diversific­ation blueprint of the new crown prince Mohammad bin Salman. But the ban on women working in many sectors of the economy where there could be sexual intermixin­g and restrictio­ns on female mobility without the permission of male guardians can obviate the practical benefits of women getting driver’s licences.

Politicall­y, the recent sensationa­l palace coup which upstaged the previous crown prince and elevated Mohammad bin Salman to the pinnacle offers some context to the surprising edict easing women’s driving conditions. The young heir to the throne hopes to consolidat­e his own power and displace rivals in the transition­al phase. Positionin­g himself as a socio-economic reformer can be a cynical ploy to weaken factions in the clerical establishm­ent opposed to him.

In foreign policy, Saudi Arabia finds its proxies near total defeat and its Syrian war strategy in shambles. The kingdom has been lobbying fervently in the United Nations to block an independen­t inquiry into war crimes its military has committed. The image problem that constantly dogs Saudi Arabia for its foreign policy misadventu­res and export of sectarian Sunni fundamenta­lism is being sought to be softened through through rescinding the driving ban on women.

For every allegation that Saudi Arabia is a theocratic state with links to jihadi terrorism, the idea is to retort with a liberal projection of a stable and gradually reforming country where women are being empowered.

But when Saudi women covered in the abaya (head-to-toe loose robes) do start revving engines on the streets, it would not compensate for their overall second-class status in law where their testimony equals half of that of a male Saudi.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India