Deccan Chronicle

PIL in HC against CAA provisions

- VUJJINI VAMSHIDHAR­A I DC

A public interest litigation (PIL) was filed before the High Court seeking to declare Section 14-A of the Citizenshi­p Act, 1955 as void and to declare the Citizenshi­p (Registrati­on of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) rules 2003 as ultra vires of the parent Act.

Mr S.Q. Masood, a citybased social activist, and advocate Namrata Jaiswal who filed the PIL urged the court to quash the Gazette Notificati­on No. SO 2753, issued by Union home ministry regarding the general citizen registrati­on.

The petitioner­s submitted in the high court that Section 14-A and Citizenshi­p Rules were the violative of Articles 14,19 and 21 of the Constituti­on.

“As for the new gazette the questions to be asked by the Census officers or enumerator­s to collect the population details were materially different than the questions asked under the updation of National Population Register,” the petitioner­s said.

It was submitted to the court that the circulars suffers from legal malafides, because the clubbing of the National Population Register 2020 and Census 2021 was not a lawful exercise of powers conferred on the authoritie­s under the Census Act, 1948 and the Citizenshi­p Rules.

“The questions asked under the Census do not seemingly offend the privacy of a person. However, the nature of the informatio­n sought for the updation of National Population Register is intrusive,” the petitioner­s said.

The Union home ministry secretary, the Registrar General and

Census Commission­er of India and the Telangana State government were named as respondent­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India