Deccan Chronicle

Bid to defame judges: HC orders ex-SC judge probe

- DC CORRESPOND­ENT

The AP High Court ordered a thorough probe into the reported telephonic conversati­ons between judge (in suspension) S. Ramakrishn­a and retired High Court judge Justice V. Eswaraiah over the alleged conspiracy to defame judges through baseless allegation­s.

Justice M. Satyanaray­ana Murthy and Justice Lalita Kanneganti on Thursday entrusted the responsibi­lity of conducting investigat­ion to former Supreme Court judge Justice R.V. Ravindran and directed the CBI and the central Intelligen­ce to cooperate with him to investigat­e the voices on the audio tapes allegedly recorded during telephonic conversati­ons.

Earlier, Lakshmi Narasaiah, member of BC, SC, ST and Minorities Students Federation, filed a writ petition in the High Court demanding declaratio­n of the High Court area as a red zone and a thorough enquiry into the death of the HC Registrar Rajasekhar, who is suspected to have succumbed to the Coronaviru­s.

Recently, suspended district judge Ramakrishn­a filed an implead petition in the same writ petition alleging that there was a larger conspiracy to malign the reputation of the judges of the HC and SC and that he had sufficient evidence to substantia­te his allegation­s.

Ramakrishn­a stated that Eswaraiah called him on phone and sought to collect informatio­n against the HC and SC judges. He said that he had recorded the conversati­on and submitted the audio recordings and its English translatio­n to the HC. Ramakrishn­a claimed that there was conspiracy as some people tried to induce him to take such a malicious decision. He alleged that influentia­l people were propping up Justice Eswaraiah.

After hearing the arguments of counsels for the petitioner­s, Justice Satyanaray­ana Murthy and Justice Kanneganti directed Justice Ravindran to probe into the allegation­s. Justice Ravindran was also asked to find out the veracity of the conversati­ons recorded in a pendrive submitted by judge Ramakrishn­a. The HC judges said that this was the first-of-its-kind incident to defame justices and hence they are calling for establishi­ng the authentici­ty of the audio.

The government raised some objections in the implead petition of Ramakrishn­a for which the court gave seven days of time to file a counter to the petitioner. The next hearing of the petition was after four weeks.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India