Deccan Chronicle

Hafeezpet Sy. No. 78: HC initiates contempt case

- N. VAMSI SRINIVAS I DC

The Telangana High Court has suo motu initiated contempt proceeding­s against revenue authoritie­s for not deleting Sy No. 78 of Hafeezpet from the prohibitor­y register to facilitate the registrati­on of properties.

In a related developmen­t, the court levied a fine of `10,000 on the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporatio­n for denying permission to two individual­s to build their house in 300 square yards (sq. yds) and 461 sq. yds of land respective­ly in Sy No. 78.

The GHMC took the plea that the land belonged to the government while denying permission to the individual­s, after allowing highrise residentia­l complexes by Mahindra Ashvita, Prajay and Aditya in 1020 acres in the same survey number.

While the High Court had set aside the notificati­on issued under Section

22A of the Registrati­on

Act, 1908 in 2014 itself, it again directed the authoritie­s to delete the land parcels in Sy No. 78 of Hafeezpet from the prohibitor­y list in October 2019.

During a recent hearing of a case, a division bench comprising Justice M.S. Ramachandr­a Rao and Justice T. Amarnath Goud took serious note of the government ignoring both the orders and directed the registry to issue a showcause notice to the tahasildar-cumjoint sub-registrar, Serilingam­pally, and posted the matter for further hearing, on Thursday last week.

● THE GHMC has denied building permission in 300 sq. yds but allowed high-rises to come up in 10-20 acres in Sy. No 78 of which the government claims ownership. The government has lost its claim six times in the Supreme Court

The state government took the suo motu contempt order to the notice of the Supreme Court on Friday by submitting it as additional material in an ongoing case in the apex court. Ironically, it did not pray for any relief but just made an attempt to draw the apex court’s attention to the contempt proceeding­s.

The bias of the government towards the rich and discrimina­tion against commoners also came to the fore in the High Court case.

The division bench, in a recent order, recorded that the “Special Government Pleader also did not deny that the respondent­s (municipal authoritie­s) had granted constructi­on permission for high rise buildings to M/s Prajay Engineers Syndicate Limited for an extent of 20 acres, to M/s Mahindra Ashvita for an extent of 10 acres, to M/s Aditya Constructi­ons Company Limited for an extent of 10 acres and to M/s G.K. Constructi­ons also in (Sy No 78 of) Hafeezpet village.”

The High Court reiterated that the government's stand on Hafeezpet lands covered in CS 14 of 1958 was clearly “vexatious and impermissi­ble.”

If on six occasions the claim of the state government on the land in Hafeezpet village has been rejected right up to the Supreme Court, it was not open to the government to still plead that it has a right on the subject land and deny building permission­s, the High Court pointed out.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India