DT Next

GO on urban body chief has saved ruling, Oppn alliances

-

CHENNAI: In announcing indirect elections for urban local body heads, the ruling AIADMK has not only avoided the embarrassm­ent of offending allies, it has also ‘saved’ its own and DMK’s alliance.

Whether the long-pending civic election happens or not, it has already disturbed the alliance dynamics in both camps. Bonhomie between the allies went for a toss in both camps even before the DMK and AIADMK invited the allies for seat sharing talks.

While the VCK ‘irritated’ DMK by requesting Chief Minister Edappadi K Palaniswam­i to ‘reserve’ Chennai Mayor post for a scheduled caste candidate, ties soared in the rival AIADMK to such a level that allies had dared each other to go it alone in the civic polls.

BJP state treasurer, who was among the critics to publicly repudiate the AIADMK dispensati­on for promulgati­ng the ordinance, did not hold back when he said the indirect elections was chosen to deny seats to allies. Though the PMK and DMDK had publicly kept calm on the issue, both parties were murmuring discontent over the alliance leader scuttling their chances in the mayoral elections.

Add the loaded political statements of Rajinikant­h and Kamal Haasan, the discordant note struck by allies has already fuelled speculatio­n on whether parties in the ruling camp were reconsider­ing existing ties and gearing up for 2021 Assembly elections.

That AIADMK had distanced itself from BJP during by polls and Vellore Parliament­ary polls should explain the discomfitu­re it has in accommodat­ing some allies during elections. “Minorities account for up to 20 per cent of the electorate in municipal limits like Chennai. It will give a sizeable advantage to the

Opposition in the civic polls. Chief Minister Edappadi K Palaniswam­i is wary of it. Hence, he negated the negative influence in one stroke by going for indirect elections,” argued political commentato­r Ravindran Doraisamy.

Understand­ably, the DMK was not amused by the Dalit allies surprise move. “We did not plan to field Udhayanidh­i. It is an altogether different issue. However, VCK has not done any good to the alliance by demanding the CM to reserve Chennai Mayorship. Our leader is not amused,” a DMK leader said under condition of anonymity.

Dismissing criticism that VCK was only responding to the way it was slighted by DMK during Lok Sabha elections, the leader said, “If they claim they were ill-treated during LS polls, they are only being ungrateful. We gave two seats, worked hard for them and made them win.”

Political analyst R Mani said, “This is definitely not a simple friction between allies. In going for indirect elections, Palaniswam­i has scored brownie points and silencing allies who were demanding a couple of mayor seats each. Hence, the strong reaction from BJP. In the DMK camp, the VCK has done it to irritate the DMK.”

 ??  ?? Thirumaval­avan
Thirumaval­avan

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India