DT Next

Arbitratio­n not litigant’s first choice, rues Justice Sanjiv Khanna

-

NEW DELHI: Supreme Court judge Justice Sanjiv Khanna on Sunday said it was concerning that arbitratio­n was not the first choice of any litigant in India and parties still preferred litigation and adjudicati­on in courts.

The top court judge, who was speaking at the closing ceremony of Delhi Arbitratio­n Weekend (DAW) in the Delhi High Court, emphasised that the system has to evolve if “we have to look 10 years ahead and want the country to become the preferred seat for arbitratio­n”.

DAW, the flagship event of Delhi Internatio­nal Arbitratio­n Centre (DIAC), was attended by experts and dignitarie­s from across the country and the globe.

Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal, Attorney General of India R Venkataram­ani and Arbitrator and Mediator of Duxton Hill Chambers V K Rajah SC also spoke at the ceremony in the presence of sitting and former judges and members of the Bar.

Justice Khanna is in line to become the Chief Justice of India (CJI) after the retirement of present CJI D Y Chandrachu­d in November.

Justice Khanna said the legislatur­e has been proactive in bringing changes in the arbitratio­n law to make it in sync with the internatio­nal standards but the number of cases being referred to arbitratio­n showed a bleak picture.

“When we come to the data with regard to the number of cases being referred to institutio­nalised arbitratio­n, the picture is again very bleak. In 2023, about 1,16,453 civil cases were instituted in civil courts in Delhi, while 4,243 suits were instituted in the Delhi High Court,” he said.

As against this, 7,358 cases were referred to arbitratio­n to the Delhi High Court arbitratio­n centre in 2023. This means the Delhi High Court arbitratio­n centre dealt with only six to seven per cent of the matters compared to the civil litigation, the judge said.

“It is a matter of concern. Arbitratio­n is not the first choice of any litigant in India. Otherwise everybody when they come to the court will move an applicatio­n or joint applicatio­ns (saying) please refer our dispute to arbitratio­n. It is very rarely happening... The fact of the matter is parties prefer litigation and adjudicati­on to arbitratio­n,” he said. Justice Khanna said that during his tenure at the Delhi High Court, he did not receive any applicatio­n in a pending civil matter by the parties for sending the matter to arbitratio­n.

 ?? ?? Justice Sanjiv Khanna
Justice Sanjiv Khanna

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India