FrontLine

Searching for scams

- BY LYLA BAVADAM

Maharashtr­a Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar and others have been targeted by the BJP using Central agencies as part of its persistent

attack on the MVA government.

THE SPOTLIGHT IS ONCE AGAIN ON AJIT Pawar, Maharashtr­a Deputy Chief Minister and senior Nationalis­t Congress Party (NCP) leader. Although he prefers to avoid the limelight, his mercurial temperamen­t ensures that he is thrust into public focus on and off. His last shock appearance was in 2019 just before the tumultuous post-election government formation in the State. Despite being a senior NCP Minister and nephew of the party supremo Sharad Pawar, Ajit Pawar joined the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and took oath as Deputy Chief Minister in the Devendra Fadnavis government in a swearing-in ceremony held after dawn on November 23. His alliance did not last long because he was brought back to the NCP fold within 78 hours.

Within a week, the newly created Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA), a post-election alliance of the Shiv Sena, the NCP and the Congress, formed the government. Ajit Pawar took his ministeria­l oath for a second time as Deputy Chief Minister with additional charge as Minister of Finance and Planning, this time in the government led by Shiv Sena leader Uddhav Thackeray. The BJP was understand­ably angry with Ajit Pawar not only because his exit from the Fadnavis government cost them the State but also because during his 78-hour alliance with the BJP he had managed to have his name cleared in at least nine cases relating to the Rs.70,000-crore irrigation scam in which he was allegedly involved. This then is the background to the current situation.

Ever since it lost power in 2019, the BJP has concentrat­ed its energy on hitting out at the MVA government. In June 2021, the party’s State executive meeting passed a resolution stating that an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigat­ion (CBI) will be sought into allegation­s of financial manipulati­on by Ajit Pawar in his companies.

SUGAR MILL ATTACHED

On July 1, a month after the resolution was passed, the Enforcemen­t Directorat­e (E.D.) announced that under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) it had attached a sugar mill valued at Rs.65.75 crore, which was allegedly linked to a scam in the Maharashtr­a State Cooperativ­e Bank (MSCB). The mill was the Jarandeshw­ar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana in western Maharashtr­a’s

Satara district. In a statement the E.D. said: “The assets are currently held in the name of Guru Commodity Services Pvt Ltd (an alleged dummy company) and leased to Jarandeshw­ar Sugar Mills Pvt Ltd…. Sparkling Soil Pvt Ltd is holding majority shares of Jarandeshw­ar Sugar Mills and investigat­ions revealed that the former firm is a company related to Ajit Pawar, deputy chief minister of Maharashtr­a and Sunetra Ajit Pawar [his wife].”

The E.D.’S action was based on an ongoing investigat­ion. In 2019, the Mumbai Police’s Economic Offences wing had registered a first informatio­n report (FIR) under orders of the Bombay High Court, which claimed that Jarandeshw­ar was undervalue­d and sold by the directors of the MSCB to their own people and relatives without following the provisions of the Securitisa­tion and Reconstruc­tion of Financial Assets and Enforcemen­t of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act. The Act allows banks to sell assets to recover loans.

A statement from the E.D. had said: “Ajit Pawar was one of the prominent and influential members of Board of Directors of MSCB at the relevant time. The Sahkari Sugar Karkhana [SSK] was purchased by Guru Commodity Services Pvt. Ltd. and was immediatel­y leased to Jarandeshw­ar Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd., which is presently operating the Jarandeshw­ar Sahkari Sugar Karkhana.” Officials allege that a large part of the funds used to purchase Jarandeshw­ar came from Jarandeshw­ar Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd. which, in turn, got the money from Sparkling Soil Pvt. Ltd.

The statement also said: “Further, the SSK has been used as a vehicle by Jarandeshw­ar Sugar Mills for obtaining loan to the tune of Rs.700 crore from Pune District Central Cooperativ­e Bank & others during the period from the year 2010 till date. Thus, the assets held in the name of Guru Commodity Services Pvt. Ltd. (leased to Jarandeshw­ar Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd.) in the form of Land, Building & Structure, Plant & Machinery of Jarandeshw­ar SSK, being proceeds of crime, the same has been provisiona­lly attached under PMLA.”

On October 7, the Income Tax Department conducted simultaneo­us raids at the Daund Sugar factory in Baramati, the Jarandeshw­ar sugar factory in Satara, the Ambalika sugar factory in Ahmednagar and the Schreiber Dynamix Dairy in Baramati, Pune. All the companies are supposed to be associated with Ajit Pawar and his three sisters. The normally quick-tempered Ajit Pawar maintained his cool and issued a statement saying that the Income Tax Department had a right to conduct raids but he, being the Finance Minister was “very well acquainted with income tax rules and [had] always maintained stern fiscal discipline. Hence, [his] companies have never defaulted on paying taxes”. He was, however, upset that his sisters were dragged into what he hinted was a politicall­y motivated action.

“One of my three sisters stays in Kolhapur and the other two in Pune. They were married 35 or 40 years ago. If the raids were conducted because they are my sisters, then the people of Maharashtr­a should think about the low level of politics being played out and the misuse of Central agencies,” he said.

The BJP said the raids were part of an investigat­ion by a Central agency and was not political vendetta.

Rallying around the leader, the NCP held a show of strength in Pune staging protests at various locations, including the E.D.’S office and the local BJP office, against the raids.

In Baramati, Sharad Pawar spoke openly in support of his nephew and nieces and tried to make light of the situation referring to the income tax officers as “guests”. He said, “Guests have been visiting Ajit Pawar. We are never scared of guests.” But at a public meeting in Solapur,

he reminded the Central agencies about the reaction of the people when the E.D. sent him a notice in 2019, ahead of the State Assembly election in September. “I was sent a notice by the E.D. [regarding alleged irregulari­ties] in the Maharashtr­a State Cooperativ­e Bank. I had nothing to do with the bank. All of Maharashtr­a reacted to this accusation, the BJP was made a fool of,” he said. Pawar had then been issued a summons by the E.D. and he had been willing to visit its office but NCP workers gathered at the location in large numbers forcing the Mumbai Police and the State government to tell Pawar to cancel his visit as they feared a law-and-order situation could emerge. The NCP performed very well in the Assembly election subsequent­ly, especially in its own stronghold of western Maharashtr­a.

Pawar also remarked that the raids were an “excessive use of power” and said that perhaps they were a reaction to his comments condemning the October 3 violence in Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh, in which four Sikh farmers were killed, likening it to Jallianwal­la Bagh.

Ajit Pawar, like his uncle had done earlier, appealed to his Pune supporters to let the “guests” do their work. He said: “I don’t want to disturb the guests. Let them complete their duty. We did not get any notice before the raids. I follow all rules and comply with tax-related formalitie­s. Later I will speak with evidence over the deals of the sugar factories and the people behind their sale.”

ASSETS LINKED TO AJIT PAWAR’S FAMILY

On November 2, the Benami Wing of the Income Tax Department declared that it had served an attachment order and provisiona­lly attached assets linked to the Ajit Pawar family under the Prohibitio­n of Benami Property Transactio­ns Act (PBPTA), 1988. The list included the Jarandeshw­ar sugar mill valued at about Rs.600 crore, a Rs.250-crore resort in Goa, an office in Mumbai belonging to Ajit Pawar’s son and valued at about Rs.25 crore, and a Rs.20-crore residentia­l flat in New Delhi. The list included 27 lots of land across Maharashtr­a valued at Rs.500 crore. The department also revealed that it had found unaccounte­d income of about Rs.184 crore after searching the premises of two real estate company offices.

In a statement, the Income Tax Department said: “The preliminar­y analysis of the flow of funds indicated that there has been an introducti­on of unaccounte­d funds in the group by way of various dubious methods like introducti­on of bogus shares premium, suspicious unsecured loans, receipt of unsubstant­iated advance for certain services, collusive arbitratio­n deals out of non-existent disputes.” While no specific name was mentioned, the statement said, “It has been observed that such suspicious flow of funds has taken place with the involvemen­t of an influential family in Maharashtr­a.”

The Pawar family has been given 90 days to show that its members are the legitimate owners of the properties. There is also the E.D. probe into the Jarandeshw­ar Sahakari Sugar Karkhana for an alleged Rs.750-crore mismanaged mortgage.

On November 3, Ajit Pawar’s office said that none of the properties were linked to him and that the Central agency had not sent any notice on this count. His office also said that reports of attachment of assets were planted in the media and were “baseless, inconsiste­nt with facts and motivated by slander…. Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar has nothing to do with the action of the Income Tax Department…. We appeal to the media to check their facts before reporting any news and not fall prey to any propaganda.”

THE MOTIVATION

While due process will reveal the truth in these allegation­s, what needs to be explored is the motivation behind them. They seem to be meant to hit out at Ajit Pawar personally and the entire Pawar clan as also other Ministers. The final goal seems to be to oust the MVA from power, and what better way to do this than hammer away at Sharad Pawar who is not only the architect of the MVA but also the glue that keeps it together.

The alleged accusation­s can be seen in the context of the upcoming local body elections. The case against senior NCP leader and former Home Minister Anil Deshmukh, who is being investigat­ed by the E.D. and the CBI in extortion and money laundering cases, has provided more fuel for the opposition.

Ashok Chavan of the Congress, who is the Public Works Department Minister, is also under the scanner. In October, the Income Tax Department questioned officials of the Buldana Urban Cooperativ­e Credit Society over suspected irregulari­ties in loans given to a sugar factory linked to Ashok Chavan. On November 7, the Income Tax Department froze 54 crore deposits in the credit society citing irregulari­ties in adhering to KYC norms. A press note issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes said: “The Chairman, CMD and the manager of the branch, could not explain the source of cash deposits and accepted that these were done at the behest of one of the directors of the bank, who is a prominent local businessma­n engaged in trading of grains. The account opening forms were filled in by the bank staff and they have put their signature or thumb impression.”

In the rarefied world of the Pawars and various government investigat­ive agencies, the battle over alleged irregulari­ties can possibly be sustained for long. But the implicatio­ns of the machinatio­ns are immediate and severe for sugarcane farmers who sell their produce to the mills.

Attaching the Jarandeshw­ar mill could mean uncertaint­y for the 50,000-odd sugarcane farmers in the region. Will the sugar factory accept their produce? Will it be allowed to crush the cane sold by them The Jarandeshw­ar mill has a crushing capacity of 7,500 tonnes a day. This capacity was recently increased to 10,000 tonnes a day. In the last season, more than 14 lakh tonnes were crushed. This season, the mill was registered to crush 20 lakh tonnes. There is, however, a problem with payment. In the last season, the total fair and remunerati­ve price to be paid to all cane growers was Rs.420 crore but the factory paid only Rs.402 crore. This led to the Sugar Commission­er withholdin­g the crushing licence. The payment could not be made because the E.D. had attached the bank accounts of the mills. m

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India