FrontLine

Resistance in print

A recent exhibition in London highlighte­d the histories of some subversive print cultures that emerged in post-independen­ce India, and the rapid advances in reproducti­on that enabled their wide disseminat­ion.

- BY RAHAAB ALLANA

“Have you ever paused to think why? Why have Gandhis and Nehrus, Sarojinis and Urmilas, Patels and Bajajs, Alams and Tandons, Mahmuds and Vidyarathi­s, Rajendra Prasads and Sunder Lals, and scores of others, each more prominent than the rest, sacrificed their physical freedom and lives of peace and staked their all?

—Hindustan Seva Dal, Bulletin No. 9, 1931 (India Office

Library records)

IN THE EXHIBITION “Crafting Subversion: DIY and Decolonial Print” (which ran from April 28 to September 3), Pragya Dhital, an associate lecturer in English literature (University College London, or UCL) and research associate in the history department at SOAS (University of London), presented fascinatin­g elided histories of some subversive print cultures that emerged in India both before and after Independen­ce.

The show had material drawn from the Asia Art Archive, the British Library’s collection of pamphlets banned in colonial India, the University of Göttingen archives, Bruce Castle Museum’s Gestetner archives, the UCL’S collection of small-press and samizdat literature, little magazines edited by the renowned English-language poet and translator Arvind Krishna Mehrotra, and an animated work by Raqs Media Collective.

Dhital’s research focusses on transnatio­nal networks of under

ground South Asian printing and publishing and highlights colonialer­a and modernist forms of anti-institutio­nal informatio­n disseminat­ion. Bypassing or tactically navigating “official” or organisati­onal constraint­s, these “solidarity publicatio­ns” were often dedicated to the spread of liberal/revolution­ary/ anarchist thought and in multiple strategic ways shaped political and artistic concerns into resistance narratives both within right-wing and imperialis­t regimes and within establishe­d democracie­s.

BRUNEI GALLERY OF SOAS

The works on view signposted the rapid technologi­cal advances in printing that enabled presses to innovate and expand their output, especially through duplicatio­n machines such as the Gestetner Scope, also known as Stencil Lightbox, invented by David Gestetner in 1879. Such devices enabled a dynamic low-tech print revolution, each edition of a work often distinct because of manual interventi­ons and through the inclusion of editorial notes, commentary, and marginalia.

The exhibition was displayed along a narrow staircase in the Brunei Gallery of London’s SOAS leading up to a corridor on the first floor. The unexpected placement heightened the sense of encounter and surprise. As one ascended the staircase, some striking documents came into view.

Post-independen­ce material included reproducti­ons from Ezra, a zine founded in 1968 by Mehrotra, who allegedly distribute­d copies from a blue overnight case in Bombay cafes. The Ezra Fakir press, as he called it, was establishe­d as part homage to the American poet Ezra Pound and presented a spectrum of modern poetry, including by Pavankumar Jain, and, to counter what Mehrotra dismissed as “archaic Anglicisms”, fresh, colloquial translatio­ns of verses by Kabir.

The exhibition also invoked other flourishin­g cultural initiative­s of the 1960s, supported by progressiv­e figures such as the Baroda-based artists Gulammoham­med

Sheikh and Bhupen

Khakhar, founders of the arts/literary magazine Vrishchik (Scorpion); and the Bombay-based poet Arun Kolatkar. Show me the road Lead me till there Or between two rivers Make me a little hut Or leave your face On my body’s parchment…

—Kabir, from the

Bhakti Special Edition of Vrishchik, 1970

The section titled “Eccentric Modernism” connected Indian publicatio­ns with radical Western DIY efforts of the time. In 1962, the

American poet-activist-rock singer Ed Sanders, based in a bookshop on New York’s Lower East Side, produced the zine F**k You: A Magazine for the Arts using a mimeograph, with an average print run of 500 copies at a time. He mailed these to eminent artists, writers, and public figures worldwide, including Pablo Picasso, Jean-paul Sartre, Samuel Beckett, and Fidel Castro.

THE VILLAGE VOICE

Mehrotra, then in Allahabad, learnt of this zine through a copy of The Village Voice, one of America’s first alternativ­e arts newsweekli­es. He was inspired, along with Alok and Amit Rai (grandsons of Munshi Premchand), to launch the zine damn you in 1965, using the Gestetner copying machine and charging a donation fee that was “anything commensura­te with your dignity— and ours also”. damn you also republishe­d content from F**k You, countercul­tural literature from across the world, and, as Mehrotra noted, “could now be reachable via a bright red letterbox nailed to a neem tree”.

A powerful example of a banned anti-colonial text in the exhibition was the Hindustan Seva Dal’s appeal that all Indians come together to oppose the British Raj: “Hindus and Musalmans rise unitedly and decide once and for all the fate of your country; for if this opportunit­y is allowed to slip by not a single way will be left open to the people even to preserve their lives…”

Another example was the Rashtriya Mahila Samiti’s audacious proposal that the police force join the mass agitations of the freedom struggle or at least refrain from harming women during political demonstrat­ions.

WRITINGS BY SOCIALIST POLITICIAN­S

Examples of political DIY production in the 1970s focussed on writings by socialist politician­s such as Jayaprakas­h Narayan and other targeted anti-congress figures who, in response to the atrocities of the Emergency imposed by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi from 1975 to 1977, persisted with demands for sampoorna kranti (total revolution) and, in many cases, suffered imprisonme­nt. On display were writings/ archives of Ram Dutt Tripathi, a Lucknow-based BBC correspond­ent jailed for criticisin­g the Emergency; he eventually represente­d himself in court.

With electricit­y supply to Indian newspapers cut off, draconian media censorship in place, and radio com

A powerful example of a banned anti-colonial text in the exhibition was the Hindustan Seva Dal’s appeal that all Indians come together to oppose the British Raj.

ing under state control, Tripathi and his comrades from the Yuva Sangharsh Samiti mass-produced anti-government petitions on a cyclostyle duplicator and distribute­d these as widely as possible.

As Dhital said in a conversati­on, a quixotic feint within the spectrum of materials on view was the Wikileaks post about the fervidly anti-american trade union leader George Fernandes reaching out to the Central Intelligen­ce Agency for support of his resistance activities during that time. In a presentati­on

made at the “BBC and the World Service: Debts and Legacies” conference in 2017, Dhital said: “By looking at how news of the assassinat­ion of the President of Bangladesh, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman (1920-1975), was disseminat­ed via foreign radio broadcasts and written about in the prison diaries of politician­s arrested in connection with the Emergency in India, I worked towards a different understand­ing of the movement of power and informatio­n within and across national boundaries.”

The exhibition also traced the contributi­on of internatio­nal zines that spoke truth to power, enunciatin­g the struggle for human rights and civil liberties, pointing to a seamless global network of resistance literature.

Such publicatio­ns included the Fluxus-influenced Schmuck, initiated by the artist couple Martha Hellion and Felipe Ehrenberg, who left Mexico for England following the army’s execution of student demonstrat­ors in Mexico City in 1968. With the art historian David Mayor, the cartoonist Chris Welch, and his part

The exhibition also traced the contributi­on of internatio­nal zines that spoke truth to power, enunciatin­g the struggle for human rights and civil liberties.

ner Madeleine Gallard, they founded the avant-garde Beau Geste Press in Devon. Their printing techniques included mimeograph, offset lithograph­y, and letterpres­s, and they produced works cheaply, in small editions. They focussed on marginalis­ed artist groups outside the prominent art centres of Western capitals, concentrat­ing on Iceland, Japan, Latin America, eastern Europe, and Canada.

Different editions of Schmuck featured work by regional artists and were each edited by an artist from the region. The group’s editorial manifesto reiterated a commitment to collaborat­ive production as a critique of the power of mainstream art institutio­ns, consumeris­m, and establishm­ent politics.

Another example was Solidarno (Solidarity) from the Polish workers’ movement, produced with offset technology during the martial law of 1981 to 1983, when the population was brutalised by military control, surveillan­ce, curfews, media censorship, and the active crushing of political dissent. The police seized approximat­ely 3,40,000 books and 73,000 leaflets at that time.

‘ANTI-ESPRESSO BAR’

Interestin­gly, in London I also visited another themed exhibition, this one at the Photograph­ers’ Gallery, that showcased material about “the Partisan coffee house (1958-1963)” in Soho. It was proclaimed as the first

socialist “anti-espresso bar” and was associated with influentia­l letterpres­s publicatio­ns such as New Left Review. The first editor-in-chief of this journal was Stuart Hall, the British Marxist activist and communicat­ions scholar/cultural theorist, who reiterates that “far from being an obvious, overused platitude, questions of multicultu­ralism, properly understood, contain the seeds of a major disruption of our normal common sense political assumption­s and are calculated to have disruptive effects on all sides”.

“Multicultu­ralism... can’t just happen. It has to be seriously, actively, put in place and interrogat­ed .... This subaltern proliferat­ion of difference... still significan­tly inflects, deflects and translates Western

imperative­s from below... it does prevent the global system from stabilisin­g itself as a fully sutured or stitched up totality and it continues to explore it at a level often below the visibility of the global media, the interstice­s, the gaps, the discontinu­ities as potential sites of resistance and interventi­on” ([2000]: “The Multicultu­ral Question”, The Political Economy Research Centre Annual Lecture, Sheffield, May 4).

And it was precisely in this way that the distinct yet interconne­cted works featured in Crafting Subversion proved that it could unsettle and reorient viewers. m Rahaab Allana is curator, Alkazi Foundation, New Delhi, and fellow, Royal Asiatic Society, London.

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? THE “ECCENTRIC MODERNISM” SECTION of the “Crafting Subversion: DIY and Decolonial Print”. The section connected Indian publicatio­ns with radical Western DIY efforts of the time.
THE “ECCENTRIC MODERNISM” SECTION of the “Crafting Subversion: DIY and Decolonial Print”. The section connected Indian publicatio­ns with radical Western DIY efforts of the time.
 ?? ?? PAGES FROM THE ZINE damn you from the late 1960s (above and below). The renowned English-language poet and translator Arvind Krishna Mehrotra launched the zine in 1965 along with Alok and Amit Rai
(grandsons of Munshi Premchand).
PAGES FROM THE ZINE damn you from the late 1960s (above and below). The renowned English-language poet and translator Arvind Krishna Mehrotra launched the zine in 1965 along with Alok and Amit Rai (grandsons of Munshi Premchand).
 ?? ??
 ?? ?? ANOTHER VIEW OF THE EXHIBITION. Duplicatio­n machines such as the Gestetner Scope, invented by David Gestetner in 1879, enabled a dynamic low-tech print revolution, each edition of a work often distinct because of manual interventi­ons and through the inclusion of editorial notes, commentary, and marginalia.
ANOTHER VIEW OF THE EXHIBITION. Duplicatio­n machines such as the Gestetner Scope, invented by David Gestetner in 1879, enabled a dynamic low-tech print revolution, each edition of a work often distinct because of manual interventi­ons and through the inclusion of editorial notes, commentary, and marginalia.
 ?? ?? THE EXHIBITION invoked flourishin­g cultural initiative­s of the 1960s that were supported by progressiv­e figures such as the Baroda-based artists Gulammoham­med Sheikh and Bhupen Khakhar, founders of the arts/literary magazine Vrishchik (Scorpion). Here, the cover of the Year 1, Issue No. 9-10, published in July/august 1970. The cover design is a linocut by K.G. Subramanya­n.
THE EXHIBITION invoked flourishin­g cultural initiative­s of the 1960s that were supported by progressiv­e figures such as the Baroda-based artists Gulammoham­med Sheikh and Bhupen Khakhar, founders of the arts/literary magazine Vrishchik (Scorpion). Here, the cover of the Year 1, Issue No. 9-10, published in July/august 1970. The cover design is a linocut by K.G. Subramanya­n.
 ?? ?? THE VRISHCHIK COVER of Year 1, Issue No. 3, published on January 10, 1970. The cover design is a linocut by Vinod Ray Patel. (Below) The cover of Year 1, Issue No. 6, published on April 10, 1970. The cover drawing is by Jeram Patel.
THE VRISHCHIK COVER of Year 1, Issue No. 3, published on January 10, 1970. The cover design is a linocut by Vinod Ray Patel. (Below) The cover of Year 1, Issue No. 6, published on April 10, 1970. The cover drawing is by Jeram Patel.
 ?? ??
 ?? ?? LETTERS TO RAM DUTT TRIPATHI, 1975-77. The letters (front and back) to Tripathi from Ram Abhilash Singh, who was incarcerat­ed in District Jail, Varanasi. Tripathi was a Lucknow-based BBC correspond­ent who was jailed for criticisin­g the Emergency.
LETTERS TO RAM DUTT TRIPATHI, 1975-77. The letters (front and back) to Tripathi from Ram Abhilash Singh, who was incarcerat­ed in District Jail, Varanasi. Tripathi was a Lucknow-based BBC correspond­ent who was jailed for criticisin­g the Emergency.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India