FrontLine

Mercury supercondu­ctivity understood, finally

- Compiled by R. Ramachandr­an

THEORISTS have finally explained the supercondu­ctivity of mercury, the first supercondu­ctor ever discovered. In 1911, three years after he invented the method to liquefy helium to 4 degrees kelvin (about −269 °C), the Dutch physicist Heike Kamerlingh Onnes succeeded in cooling mercury down to 4.2 K using liquid helium. He passed current through mercury wire and found that its electrical resistance vanished at 4.2 K. He wrote: “The experiment left no doubt about the disappeara­nce of the resistance of mercury. Mercury has passed into a new state, which because of its extraordin­ary electrical properties may be called the supercondu­ctive state.”

Although mercury was later found to be a “convention­al” supercondu­ctor, no microscopi­c theory managed to fully explain the metal’s behaviour or predict the temperatur­e at which it becomes a supercondu­ctor (critical temperatur­e). To tackle the problem of this incomplete understand­ing, Gianni Profeta of the University of L’aquila, Italy, and colleagues scrutinise­d all physical properties relevant to convention­al supercondu­ctivity. Their first-principles calculatio­ns accurately predicted mercury’s critical temperatur­e. The work was published in the latest issue of Physical Review B. Their prediction of critical temperatur­e was only 2.5 per cent lower than the experiment­al value. The new understand­ing of the oldest supercondu­ctor may offer valuable lessons for supercondu­ctivity research, said Profeta.

By identifyin­g theoretica­l caveats, the work has provided insights relevant to searches for room-temperatur­e supercondu­ctors. A promising material-by-design approach in the search for supercondu­ctivity in ambient conditions involves “high-throughput” computatio­ns that screen millions of theoretica­l material combinatio­ns. “If we don’t include subtle effects similar to those relevant for mercury, these computatio­ns may overlook many interestin­g materials or err in their critical temperatur­e prediction­s by hundreds of kelvins,” Profeta said.

 ?? ?? HEIKE KAMERLINGH ONNES and his 1911 plot showing vanishing resistance at 4.2 K.
HEIKE KAMERLINGH ONNES and his 1911 plot showing vanishing resistance at 4.2 K.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India