AAP concedes defeat on bypoll verdict eve
FIGHT BEGINS WITHIN Party dissolves its Gurdaspur and Pathankot units with immediate effect; Khaira ‘not informed’
New structural units will be announced after holding detailed consultations and feedback from the party officebearers and MLAs who campaigned extensively in the Lok Sabha byelection. GULSHAN CHHABRA, AAP state secretary
CHANDIGARH: Any political party would ideally wait for adverse poll results togo into damage control. But the A am Aadmi Party (AAP) does not consider such a formality a necessity. Conceding defeat a day before theGu rd aspur by poll verdict, the party dissolved its units inGu rd a spur and Path ankot districts with immediate effect.
Party’s state secretary Gulshan Chhabra made the formal announcement on Saturday attributing the decision to“extensive deliberations and feedback” from the state president and Sangrur MP Bhagwant Mann and co-president Aman Arora, an MLAfromSunam.
Chhabra said the new structural units of bothGu rd a spur and Pathankot districts would be announced soon after having detailed consultation sand feedback from the party office-beare rs and ML As“who campaigned extensively” in the Gurdaspur byelection.
The decision also laid bare the chinks in the party unit. On why did the party not wait for the results, leader of Opposition Suk hp alKh air a, when contacted, said he had not been informed about the decision.
While AAP was the first to go off the block by announcing a candidate, Maj Gen Sure shKh aj uri a(retd ), the party campaign, right from funding to planning, suffered major jolts.
Of nine of its candidates in the assembly segments inGu rd a spur parliamentary constituency, five had joined rival camps.
Party’s face in the 2014 parliamentary polls, Sucha Singh Ch hotep ur, had already been discredited and expelled by the party ahead of the state polls in February. AA P’ s Maj ha zone head and Qadian candidate Kamalpreet SinghKa ki joined the Shiro man i Akali Dal soon after announcement of the bypoll. Party general secretary and Gurdaspur bypoll coordinator Lakhvir Singh defected to the Congress days ahead of the bypoll.
The phrase“who campaigned extensively” itself shows where lies the blame. According to party sources, two MLAs each were assigned duties in one assembly seat but not all camped there.
AAP ally, Lok Insaaf Party, joined the campaign but the Ba ins brothers of Ludhiana, B alwinder and Simarjit, have no sway here and did not venture beyond Dera Baba Nanak seat.
“The campaign crumbled due to lack of support, strategy and planning. No funds came from Delhi. Most state leaders contributed from their own pocket, including Ba ins brothers. Party’ s co-incharge Aman Arora returned from his foreign trip few days before the campaign ended ,” sources said.
The A AP was also fighting the legacy of poor assembly results here. The party had failed to open its account in the Majha belt, which the Congress had swept.
Grappling with absence of local leaders to lead the campaign in the nine assembly segments, the A AP had also to con tend with depleted cadre strength and morale.
Eventually, the bypoll which began as a three-horse race between the Congress, A kali DalB JP and the A AP, became a bipolar battle between the two ruling parties, one at the state and the other at the Centre, leaving AAP a persona non grata in the elections, despite Khajuria focusing his campaign on local issues and not political slander.