Why middle order worries selectors
Panel concerned but defends experiments with Nos. 4, 5 & 6
MUMBAI: Too much experimentation is eroding India’ s middle- order strength rather than strengthening it, prompting chairman of selectors MSK Prasad to address it as a ‘concern’. The chopping and changing however isn’t going to stop any time soon.
According to Prasad, they are going to look at all options before closing in on a particular squad before a major event (read 2019 World Cup ).“The team management, the selection committee all of us are definitely concerned about it. And that’ s the reason we are trying before a big event comes up or before we finalise a final squad for a major event,” said Prasad on Monday after the selection committee meeting to pick squads for the T20 series against New Zealand and two home Tests against Sri Lanka. “By then we will try out different options, and there are some of the guys who are doing (well) at India A (level). We will keep trying options before we close on a particular squad,” he said. Barring Sunday’s loss to New Zealand, India haven’ t been challenged much in the ODIs --- winning 3-1 in West Indies ,5-0 in Sri Lanka and 4-1 at home against Australia---since the Champions Trophy final loss to Pakistan. But that can’ t coverup themess India’s middleorder has been, courtesy the constant experimentation. For example, against Australia, Manish Pandey batted at No 4 for majority of the matches while Hardik Pandya did that job in the first match in Chennai. On Sunday, Kedar Jadhav came out to bat at that spot and Dinesh Kart hi kat No5. Jadhav made 12 off 25 and Karthik 37 off 47 balls. The experimentation has been mindboggling. Over the last 10 ODIs (see graphic), India have fielded four batsmen at No. 4, five at No. 5 and three at No. 6. Situations dictate batting order shuffles but surely there can be some method to the madness. There have been inadvertent casualties as well. In Sri Lanka, Prasad hadsaid the team would try out KL Rahul at No 4 but the experiment was shelved after just one attempt.
“The potential that KL Rahul is, it is unfortunate that we are not able to accommodate. We tried him at the number four slot, and unfortunately that did not work. But basically we know that KL Rahul is an opener. Since Ajinkya Rahane has done well there, it makes sense to continue with him and bring in a specialist at number four spot,” he said.
With 19 months to go for the 2019 World Cup in England, it is high time India select a group that travels, plays and bonds together for at least a year before the showpiece event.