Hindustan Times (Bathinda)

The new surrogacy bill protects the interests of all

It will help childless couples, while ensuring that the surrogate mother, and the child, do not suffer

- BHUPENDER YADAV Bhupender Yadav is an MP and chairman of the Rajya Sabha select committee on surrogacy law The views expressed are personal

Research done by the World Health Organizati­on (WHO) estimated that in 2010, 48.5 million couples worldwide were unable to have a child of their own. They suffered from infertilit­y, which, the WHO says, is a disease of the reproducti­ve system defined by the failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotecte­d sexual intercours­e. Given the advancemen­ts in medical science, couples have been trying different medical solutions to have children.

Over the years, India has become the hub of the global fertility industry, with reproducti­ve medical tourism becoming a significan­t activity. Clinics in India have been offering assisted reproducti­ve technology (ART) services such as gamete donation, intrauteri­ne inseminati­on (IUI), in vitro fertilisat­ion (IVF), intracytop­lasmic sperm injection (ICSI), preimplant­ation genetic diagnosis (PGD), and gestationa­l surrogacy.

Surrogacy, in particular, has drawn many childless couples to India in the last few decades. Surrogacy is an arrangemen­t where a woman (the surrogate) offers to carry a baby through pregnancy on behalf of a couple, and then return the baby to the intended parent(s) once it is born. Broadly, surrogacy is of two types — traditiona­l and gestationa­l. Traditiona­l surrogacy involves inseminati­on of the surrogate naturally, or artificial­ly, with the semen of the male partner of the childless couple. A child born this way is geneticall­y related to the surrogate mother. This has several ethical, social and legal implicatio­ns. In the case of gestationa­l surrogacy, an embryo from the ovum and sperm of intended couple is fertilised in a test tube and transferre­d to the womb of the surrogate. A child born through gestationa­l surrogacy has no genetic similarity to the surrogate mother.

While many couples benefited from surrogacy facilities in India, the practice has persisted without any legal framework, working only on the basis of vague guidelines. Under these circumstan­ces, there have been many reported incidents of unethical practices surroundin­g surrogacy. These practices include the exploitati­on of surrogate mothers, abandonmen­t of children born out of surrogacy, and the import of human embryos and gametes.

There has been widespread condemnati­on of commercial surrogacy because of these very issues. In 2014, an Australian couple refused to accept one of their biological twins born through surrogacy because of the gender of the child. Many poor women in India took to becoming surrogate mothers repeatedly despite grave implicatio­ns to their health. Despite this, commercial surrogacy was upheld by the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Baby Manaji v Union of India. Similarly, in the case of Jan Balaz v Anand Municipali­ty, the Gujarat High Court (HC) reiterated the apex court judgment upholding commercial surrogacy. The HC said commercial surrogacy was held to be legal in India as there was no law prohibitin­g womb-lending or surrogacy agreements.

In its 228th report presented in 2009, the Law Commission of India recommende­d that surrogacy be regulated through a suitable legislatio­n. The Law Commission recommende­d the only altruistic surrogacy be legalised and commercial surrogacy be totally banned. The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2019, was passed by the Lok Sabha on August 5. The Rajya Sabha, in its meeting held on November 21, 2019, adopted a motion to refer the bill to a Select Committee.

The committee studied the best practices in surrogacy globally keeping in mind Indian needs. In the United States and Argentina, surrogacy requests are decided by independen­t surrogacy committees. In the United Kingdom, Netherland­s, Ireland, Denmark, Belgium, South Africa, Australia, Canada and Greece, only altruistic surrogacy is allowed. Commercial surrogacy is legally allowed in countries like Russia, Ukraine, and Thailand. In France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, Italy and Iceland, surrogacy is banned in all forms.

The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill is an ethical, moral and social legislatio­n as it protects the exploitati­on of the surrogate mother and protects the rights of the child born through surrogacy. It seeks to constitute a national surrogacy board, state surrogacy boards and appointmen­t of appropriat­e authoritie­s for regulation of the practice and process of surrogacy.

To begin with, the couple seeking surrogacy will have to provide compelling condition for wanting a child through surrogacy. They have to be Indians, but can also be nonresiden­t Indians, persons of Indian origin or overseas citizen of India. The surrogate needs to be married and have her child as some procedures of surrogacy may lead to infertilit­y. Single women cannot opt to have a child through surrogacy, but exceptions have been made for widows and divorced women if they obtain a certificat­e of recommenda­tions from the National Surrogacy Board. An insurance coverage for 16 months is proposed for the surrogate mother to take care of all her medical needs in the case of emergency conditions/complicati­ons. Surrogacy clinics cannot undertake surrogacyr­elated procedures unless they are registered with the appropriat­e authority.

Surrogacy is a blessing for many childless couples. The bill tries to ensure that while childless couples get what they want, nobody, including the surrogate mother and the children born out of surrogacy, suffer.

SINGLE WOMEN CANNOT OPT TO HAVE A CHILD THROUGH SURROGACY, BUT EXCEPTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE FOR WIDOWS AND DIVORCED WOMEN

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India