Hindustan Times (Bathinda)

A joint book on two towering individual­s

- ■ K Natwar Singh letters@htlive.com ■ K Natwar Singh is a politician and author

MJ Akbar began his career as a journalist. He soon made a mark. He became well known as a writer and editor. In 1989 he was elected to the Lok Sabha from Bihar as a Congress candidate. He is a fine and sensitive author. His biography of Jawaharlal Nehru published in 1989 (Nehru’s birth centenary) is among the very best, so far. It compares favourably with S Gopal’s three volume life of Nehru. MJ, as he is popularly known, is at present a BJP member of the Rajya Sabha.

His latest book, Gandhi’ Hinduism: The struggle against Jinnah’s Islam, appeared last month. A joint book on these towering individual­s is not an undertakin­g free of perils. Even an accomplish­ed writer could take the wrong road. Akbar has navigated the turbulent Gandhi-jinnah waters with exemplary understand­ing and literary skill.

Gandhi’s fame and following have been worldwide. Not so with Jinnah. He is hardly known outside the Indian subcontine­nt. Their characters were as different as chalk and cheese. Neither could have been easy to live with. It was difficult to discern when Gandhi was being a saint and when a politician. Jinnah too would be a complex mixture of non-gandhian obduracy and counterfei­t Muslim fundamenta­lism.

It becomes evident from MJ’S book that, to a considerab­le extent, Jinnah was both overestima­ted and underestim­ated by Gandhi, Nehru, and Patel. For Gandhi he was Quaid-iazam.

For Jinnah he was Mr Gandhi. Nehru and Jinnah had contempt for each other. Jinnah called Nehru “Peter Pan”. I have never been able to comprehend (neither has Akbar) why Gandhi, in September 1944, walked 17 times to meet Jinnah in his Malabar Hill House. Why did not anyone suggest to Gandhi that with his showing such Gandhian courtesy he was only enhancing Jinnah’s image and importance. Akbar has a nearly-50page chapter headed “Nehru’s Historic Blunder”. It is the most gripping in the book. He quotes Maulana Azad: “I have neverthele­ss to say with regret that this was not the first time that he (Nehru) did immense harm to the national cause... Jawaharlal is however very vain and cannot stand that anybody else should receive greater support or admiration than he.”

Akbar’s research is awesome. His descriptio­n of Gandhiji’s 21-day fast in February-march 1943 is most touching. The Mahatma then was in jail in the Aga Khan’s palace in Poona. Churchill asked the wooden-headed arch conservati­ve Viceroy Linlithgow if Gandhi was adding glucose to the water he drank. This was a false and despicable flight of Churchilli­an imaginatio­n. No glucose was added. Churchill kept nagging the Secretary of State for India, Leo Amery, why, “Gandhi had not died”.

Muhammad Ali Jinnah achieved his life’s ambition with the undoubted and well-documented help of the British – Churchill in particular. Gandhi became immortal, dying with the name of God on his lips. This is a masterly book, with fresh insights and sound conclusion­s. It is judgmental in a very sophistica­ted way. Finally, no similar book has ever been written.

 ?? UNIVERSAL IMAGES GROUP VIA GETTY ?? Muhammad Ali Jinnah and MK Gandhi in 1946
UNIVERSAL IMAGES GROUP VIA GETTY Muhammad Ali Jinnah and MK Gandhi in 1946
 ??  ?? Gandhi’s Hinduism: The Struggle Against Jinnah’s Islam
MJ Akbar
300pp, ~699 Bloomsbury
Gandhi’s Hinduism: The Struggle Against Jinnah’s Islam MJ Akbar 300pp, ~699 Bloomsbury

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India