Hindustan Times (Bathinda)

A lot of sweet nothings

- Swetha Sivakumar To reach Swetha Sivakumar with questions or feedback, email upgrademyf­ood@gmail.com

It was while analysing chemical compounds in coal tar that Russian researcher Constantin Fahlberg (below) of Johns Hopkins University discovered the world’s first artificial sweetener. After working in his lab all day, Fahlberg grabbed a piece of bread at dinner and found that it tasted sweet. He rushed back to his beakers and, the story goes, tasted every ingredient he had worked with. It turned out that benzoic sulfimide was the sweetener. And so, in 1879, saccharin was born.

Fahlberg took its name from the Latin word for sugar (saccharum), which in turn has roots in the Sanskrit sharkara. He patented the compound in 1885, and soon began the first factory to produce saccharin, in Germany.

Because the body does not metabolise artificial sweeteners, they pass right through, and are therefore among the few things that are truly zero-calorie. As such, saccharin caught on with diabetics as a sugar substitute. It began to be used as a sweetener in the pharmaceut­ical industry. And since it was 300 times sweeter than sugar, companies such as CocaCola began using it to reduce costs.

But was benzoic sulfimide safe to consume? The question plagued chemist and food safety activist Harvey Wiley. As the processed foods segment boomed in the US — we’ve talked recently about breakfast cereals, chocolate bars and jams, all of which were being mass-produced for the first time in this period — Wiley began to campaign for uniform standards and greater transparen­cy. It was his efforts that led to the formation of the US Food and Drug Administra­tion (FDA) in 1906.

But even then-president Theodore Roosevelt, who signed the FDA Act into law, would not hear ill of saccharin. He was taking it, on doctor’s orders. “Anybody who says saccharin is injurious to health is an idiot,” the portly gentleman reportedly said.

Over the next 80 years, a range of chemical sweeteners was developed: aspartame, acesulfame potassium (Ace-k), sucralose.

All artificial sweeteners have some things in common: They are not found in nature, but are manufactur­ed in labs. They are several hundred times sweeter than sugar. They have zero calories.

Through the decades there has been talk of links to cancer, obesity, but no clear evidence has been found in human trials. While there has been controvers­y over the possible impact of long-term use, government­s around the world have approved most non-nutritive sweeteners, with the rider of some limits for safe consumptio­n.

New studies do suggest, however, that artificial sweeteners such as saccharin, sucralose and aspartame can negatively impact the gut microbiome.

An alternativ­e emerged in the 1990s, when non-caloric sweeteners began to be extracted from plants such as stevia and monk fruit. There are two issues with this class of sweeteners: The first is that many leave a bitter aftertaste. The second is a far more significan­t one that affects all artificial sweeteners: the problem of retail packaging.

You’d need just a few grains of any of these sweeteners for a mug of coffee. So,

to make them easy to use, they’re packaged in sachets where most of the mass comes from bulking agents such as maltodextr­in, a type of carbohydra­te that not only has the same calories as sugar (1 tsp = 4 calories) but has a higher glycemic index (105, against sugar’s 65)!

Will there ever be a better answer? The next big thing in sugar substitute­s is likely to be sugar alcohols (erythritol, maltitol, etc), which are naturally occurring substances in plants and vegetables. Extracting them for mass production is expensive, though. Sugar alcohols are also less sweet than sugar. They contain fewer calories, but not zero. And too much of a sugar alcohol can cause bloating and gastric distress.

For now, the best thing to do is assess the impact of the sweeteners you consume on your body. There’s a simple test: How do you feel after ingesting a product? If the answer is, “not great, actually”, switch to another one. After all, the market is full of

big businesses trying hard to answer the age-old question of how to have your cake and eat it too.

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Which of these treats was made using an artificial sweetener? The answer could be any, or all. But even with no calories, there are risks to overusing sugar substitute­s.
Which of these treats was made using an artificial sweetener? The answer could be any, or all. But even with no calories, there are risks to overusing sugar substitute­s.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India