Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

40 leopards killed in Jan alone

More than a third of them were poached, according to the Wildlife Protection Society of India

- Badri Chatterjee

MUMBAI: More than a third of the 40 leopards that died in the country in the first month of this year were killed by poachers.

Of the 40-odd deaths in January, 15 were poached (38%), three died in road and rail accidents, two were killed by villagers and 15 were found dead, revealed data from the Wildlife Protection Society of India (WPSI).

In 2017, there were 431 leopard deaths, of which 159 were poached and 63 were casualties of road and rail accidents.

Of 436 leopard deaths in 2016, natural causes killed 282 and 154 were killed by poachers.

More than 1,600 leopards have been killed by poachers in the past decade, according to WPSI.

Most deaths were recorded at Uttarakhan­d with 12 deaths and four poaching cases, followed by Maharashtr­a with seven deaths and two poaching cases, Uttar Pradesh recorded four deaths and Andhra Pradesh, three.

Other states like Chhattisga­rh, MP, Kerala, Karnataka, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, all recorded at least one leopard death in January.

Leopards are protected under Schedule 1 of the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. According to a country-wide census conducted in 2015, which also happens to be the first-ever leopard count, there are between 12,000 to 14,000 leopards in the country.

“The leopard population in India is high as compared to other countries, and natural deaths are bound to happen. However, what is alarming is the rate at which poaching continues across the country. Over the past decade, poaching incidents have accounted for around 38-40% of the total deaths for leopards,” said Tito Joseph, programme coordinato­r, WPSI. “There is need for better planning and joint action, not just at the policy level, but on the ground, to ensure core forest areas are not easily accessible to the public. Better protocol in urban areas to ensure man-animal conflict is controlled, and developmen­tal projects are planned without disturbing the habitat of these large carnivores.”

MS Negi, additional general of forests, Ministry of Environmen­t, Forests and Climate Change (MOEFCC) said, “With a growing population for this species, there is fragmentat­ion of forests in many states, primarily Uttarakhan­d and Maharashtr­a. As a result of the latter, the prey base within forest areas is reducing and the animal is moving closer to urban patches. The animal is not under threat as such, but we are giving priority to its protection. We have already directed state forest department­s and funds dispensed to ensure that this habitat fragmentat­ion is controlled and such cases reduced.”

Experts said the Centre needs to focus on keeping the animals in the forest, explaining that increasing contact with humans is causing deaths. “Similar to tiger and elephant conservati­on measures, leopards need to be monitored closely and the prey base needs to be concentrat­ed to certain specific locations within forest areas, restrictin­g them from venturing to urban spaces. This way, their population can be controlled, habitat can be safeguarde­d, and man-animal conflict can be reduced,” said Umendra Sharma, former principal chief conservato­r of forest, UP.

“As far as protected forest areas go, conservati­on of leopards is in tune with tigers,” said Anishandhe­ria,president,wildlife Conservati­on Trust. “70% of the leopard population in India lives within tiger habitats, which are protected spaces and will remain safeguarde­d. The challenge is the remaining 30% that are in human-dominated landscapes, where we need better strategies to live with these big cats by moderating human behaviour, and being more sensitive towards these species.”

Joseph pointed out that the ‘Living with Leopards’ model being followed in Mumbai Metropolit­an Region needs to be replicated across the country to control man-animal conflicts in urban areas. On January 13, a male leopard strayed into a residentia­l society in Mulund (East) in Mumbai and attacked five people. While the injuries were minor, a four-hour rescue operation and crowd control by the forest department saw the animal tranquilis­ed and rushed to safety. On December 10, a similar incident was reported from a society in Andheri (East), where a 12-hour rescue operation ensured the animal was rescued and untoward situations avoided. SHILLONG/NEW DELHI: This is one jacket over which both the BJP and the Congress are finding it hard to keep their shirts on.

The parties tore into each other after the Meghalaya unit of BJP, in an apparent bid to get even with Rahul Gandhi over his “suit-boot” jibe at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, claimed the Congress chief wore a jacket worth ₹63,000 to a concert in Shillong on Tuesday.

“So @Officeofrg, soot (pun intended!)-boot ki sarkar with ‘black’ money fleeced from Meghalayan State exchequer by rampant corruption? Instead of singing away our woes, you could have given a report card of your inefficien­t govt in Meghalaya! Your indifferen­ce mocks us!,” the BJP’S Meghalaya unit tweeted. It also tweeted an image of a Burberry jacket, similar to the one that Gandhi wore, having a price tag of US$995 (a little over ₹63,000).

In another tweet, the BJP alleged the Congress government in Meghalaya was mired in corruption.

It said instead of attending a musical event, Gandhi should have given a report card of the state government.

Out on the hustings, an unfazed Gandhi fired his “suitboot ki sarkar” salvo at Modi afresh, saying he was always found in the company of people attired in suits and not those that are poor. “You will not see him (Modi) hug a poor person, talk to a poor person or even engage with a poor person. You will see him with others.

There is a particular distance he maintains with the poor people which he does not with Mr Obama or others,” he said in Shillong.

“The fact of the matter is that he (Modi) is still a suit-boot person. He has not done anything .... ,” Gandhi said.

The tweet suggesting that the jacket worn by Gandhi was bought with black money drew a sharp reaction from Congress leader Renuka Chowdhury, who alleged the BJP was leading a “suit-boot ki sarkar” at the Centre and had no moral authority to question Gandhi. She said the saffron party was “frustrated” due to his “rising popularity”.

Chowdhury accused the Modi government of being “idle”, and

CONGRESS WILL RETAIN POWER, SAYS GANDHI

Meanwhile, Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday said the ruling Congress party will retain power in the state. He also expressed confidence that the Congress would bounce back in Bjp-ruled Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisga­rh where elections are due in a few months.

“I think we will do well and we will win the elections in Meghalaya,” he said. “I won’t go into specifics as to how many seats and things like, but across the country there is a feeling that the BJP is not listening to the people...it is crushing voices, they are taking decisions unilateral­ly without consulting the people and there is a backlash against them on several issues.”

“Demonetisa­tion is one of them. Implementa­tion of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is another one. The country is asking these fundamenta­l questions to (PM Narendra) Modi. He came promising economic growth and providing jobs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India