Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)

Experts slam claim that human activity not behind recent flood

-

Amanjeet Singh Salyal, Neeraj Santoshi and Jayashree Nandi nearly washed away two hydropower plants downstream.

The Defence Geo-informatic­s Research Establishm­ent – a premier research body under the Defence Research and Developmen­t Organisati­on (DRDO) that is studying the reasons for the February floods – said the tragedy was not “immediatel­y” a human-induced disaster.

But global warming and heating up of the Himalayas, which scientists say are decisively caused by human actions, could be the main reasons for the glacial breach in Chamoli district, Lokesh Kumar Sinha, director of DGRE, told HT at the body’s headquarte­rs in Chandigarh.

“There is a need to look upon the demographi­c pressures in a systematic way but as far as this particular tragedy is concerned in our preliminar­y investigat­ions the role of human activity is not the immediate cause,” said Sinha. “It [glacial breach] was far away from the area where several constructi­ons [NTPC hydel power project in Tapovan and Rishi Ganga hydel plant] are taking place,” Sinha added.

Experts have repeatedly pointed out that glacial retreat due to climate crisis along with infrastruc­ture projects such as dams could lead to large-scale disasters in the ecological­ly sensitive regions, while the proximity of human settlement­s could exacerbate loss of life and damage to property in Uttarakhan­d.

Hemant Dhyani, member of the Supreme Court-appointed expert body to study the environmen­tal impact of hydropower projects after the deadly 2013 Kedarnath floods, questioned how the February disaster was not linked to human activity.

“Tragedy happened because over 200 people were working in two dams quite close to the glacial region. Had these dams not been here, the flash floods would have subsided without any loss to life and property”, he said. Dhyani added that the burden on the ecology due to constructi­on on Himalayan slopes made the region prone to disasters

“And our expert body had also said that these paraglacia­l zones (sediment hot spots in Himalayas close to the glaciers) are vulnerable areas and warned that such disasters can take place in these areas...” he said. The environmen­tal activist was referring to another Sc-appointed committee, of which he was a part and which had recommende­d against developmen­t projects in the Rishi Ganga catchment area in 2014. But all recommenda­tions of the panel were not accepted by the government. “The Chamoli tragedy happened because they built dams so close to the glaciers. And this is the main human trigger,” said Anil Joshi, founder of Dehradun-based NGO Himalayan Environmen­tal Studies and Conservati­on Organizati­on (HESCO).

Experts pitch in

“It’s a prepostero­us statement. The official is belittling the tragedy... How can one ignore human induced climate change on the Himalayas... Any more unplanned constructi­on or anthropoge­nic pressure on Uttarakhan­d will be suicidal,” said Mallika Bhanot of the Ganga Ahvaan NGO.

Professor Anil Kulkarni of the Divecha Center for Climate Change at the Indian Institute of Science also cautioned there was a need to study the issue first. “We need to study the issue very critically before passing any judgement on this disaster. What was the distance between the Rishi Ganga power plant and the ice or rock which fell? Whether during the constructi­on phase the project caused any micro-tremors?,” said Kulkarni.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India