Hindustan Times (Delhi)

CIC to act against babus refusing reply to RTI pleas

CRACKING THE WHIP Transparen­cy watchdog to consider demand to penalise civil servants who avoid such applicatio­ns

- Aloke Tikku letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: Chief informatio­n commission­er (CIC) Radha Kumar Mathur on Tuesday promised to favourably consider demands that the transparen­cy watchdog imposes penalties on civil servants who avoid responding to right to informatio­n (RTI) requests.

Mathur’s promise came at a meeting with RTI activists convened by the National Campaign for People’s Right to Informatio­n (NCPRI) where poor implementa­tion of proactive disclosure­s was being discussed.

A study released last week pointed out that informatio­n commission­s had become impediment­s to implementa­tion of the law. The report said that most decisions taken by them were without justificat­ion and often public informatio­n officers were let off the hook without penalties in 99% of the cases.

Mathur heard the grievances of members of the forum some of who said that the penalties levied by the CIC had not been implemente­d. He then said that he was willing to resolve to impose penalties wherever required. The CIC also agreed to come up with a format for the orders which ensures they are complete.

The study had estimated that 60% of orders issued by the commission­s were incomplete and did not record basic informatio­n.

The study – that analysed the time taken by commission­s to decide an informatio­n appeal and the quality of the orders – said informatio­n commission­s were increasing­ly failing to deliver on their mandate.

And this inability to perform started from the time a citizen filed an appeal against denial of informatio­n, the report added.

Penalties were imposed in only 1.3% of the cases where delays in informatio­n occured, according to Anjali Bharadwaj of Sartak Nagrik Sangathan (SNS) said.

Financiall­y, this means that the reluctance of the commission­s nationwide cost the exchequer `290 crore.

“But even more important than the revenue lost is the loss of deterrence value that the threat of penalty was supposed to have provided,” Bharadwaj said.

A STUDY RELEASED LAST WEEK POINTED OUT THAT INFORMATIO­N COMMISSION­S HAD BECOME IMPEDIMENT­S TO IMPLEMENTI­NG LAW

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India