Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Get the picture right this time

-

A panel wants Doordarsha­n and All India Radio toadoptcor­porategove­rnance

The problems that dog India’s state-run media have made for lively dinner-time conversati­on for decades. None of the suggested remedies have worked as Doordarsha­n and All India Radio (AIR) sink deeper into a morass of increased government interferen­ce, inept babus and poor programme staffing. But now, a top bureaucrat panel has advised the prime minister to make public broadcaste­rs “corporate entities” to increase elbow room for independen­t decision-making. This is an idea worth trying.

Doordarsha­n and AIR’s woes are cyclic. The lack of innovative programmin­g depresses viewership and hence revenues, driving the broadcaste­rs to seek the patronage of politician­s who clear bloated budgets. But this financial muscle encourages politician­s to dictate programmin­g. A corporate-style governance is the first step to change this, on two counts. One, viewership is often driven by non-news entertainm­ent content. Private channels have shown popular programmin­g by independen­t producers and artists not only draw viewers but buoy revenues. The only way to shake the state broadcasti­ng bosses out of their slumber is provide yearly targets – something only a corporate set-up can do. This will ward off complacenc­y that translates to blandness . Two, for news content, less dependence on government funds will automatica­lly empower editors to be more adventurou­s with presentati­on and not toe the line set by the government. The money generated can be used to upgrade in-house infrastruc­ture, which often looks shoddy when compared to private channels. A corporate-style broadcaste­r will be able to attract new technician­s and presenters , sorely needed if Doordarsha­n and AIR are to be relevant. Becoming a corporate entity is only a first step, to be followed by lesser government oversight, more independen­ce for directors and a clear “arms-length” policy. One frequent objection to corporatis­ation is the fear that state media will become shrill and sensationa­l.

The proclivity to dictate what is sober or responsibl­e content instead of catering to viewers’ demands is behind the downfall of state-run media. Attempts at reform are stonewalle­d with a stock defence on the need for a public broadcaste­r for rural areas and the poor. But a mandate of public service is no excuse for poor content as is evident by small towns and even villages moving away from AIR and Doordarsha­n. A radical overhaul is the only way forward.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India