Most ATMs prone to fraud, lack basic security features

NEWDELHI: Three of five ATMs in India use outdated technology and lack basic security features, making them prime targets for fake currency, banking experts say.

Cash loaders don’t use the “one-time combination” (OTC) locking method — technology that is commonplace in developed countries — to operate most of these machines. Making things worse is the fact that most of the country’s 220,000 ATMs are not monitored by working closed-circuit television cameras (CCTV).

The poor security allows cash loaders to use ATMs whenever they want, without any monitoring. This, experts say, indicates that crises such as the recovery of five fake ₹2,000 notes carrying the “Children’s Bank of India” mark from a south

Delhi ATM last week are disasters waiting to happen. “We have urged the banks several times to install OTC locking system at the ATMs so that monitoring improves; unfortunately most banks do not pay heed,” said NSG Rao, secretary of Cash Logistics Association. He said banks had no data on whether CCTVs installed in ATMs were in working condition.

ATM security is under the spotlight after a string of cases of fake currency recovery from various parts of the country — some of the banknotes photocopied or high-quality replications — months after the government introduced new ₹2,000 notes after scrapping old ₹500 and ₹1,000 notes.

The unsecured ATMs have also seen a spike in reports of theft, from 596 cases in 2013-14 to more than 900 in 2015-16. Last week, a man complained to Uttar Pradesh Police that he received a photocopy of a ₹2,000 note from a State Bank of India ATM in Shahjahanpur.

Cash is usually loaded not by banks but logistics companies, who are responsible for transportation from bank currency chests to branches and ATMs.

CONTINUED ON P 10 NEW DELHI: The Delhi high court on Monday dismissed the city government’s appeal against an interim stay on mandatory use of the neighbourhood criterion for nursery admissions to 298 private unaided schools built on public land.

A bench of chief justice G Rohini and justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal refused to interfere with a verdict that allowed schools to go ahead with admissions using their own criteria.

“We are of the view that the implementation of the impugned notification… can await the final result of the writ petitions (currently pending before a singlejudge bench),” the court said.

The question of making neighbourhood the sole admission criteria needed “deeper consideration”, the court added, because of the uneven distribution of schools in different localities.

Over 150,000 aspirants vie for 125,000 nursery seats every year but the process often gets caught in last-minute litigation.

On January 7, the government made it compulsory for schools to admit children who live in that neighbourhood. On February 14, a bench termed the move “against the public interest” before ordering an interim stay.