Hindustan Times (Delhi)

‘Use of loudspeake­rs not integral part of Azaan’

- Surender Sharma surender.sharma@hindustant­imes.com

The Punjab and Haryana high court has said while Azaan is undoubtedl­y an integral part of Islam, it does not necessaril­y have to be blared through loudspeake­rs.

A single-judge bench comprising justice MMS Bedi made the observatio­n in connection with a plea filed against singer Sonu Nigam over a series of comments posted on Twitter last month. Terming the petition as a “cheap” attempt to gain publicity, justice Bedi said: “A fair interpreta­tion of the words used by respondent no 4 (Sonu Nigam) clearly indicates that the word ‘gundagardi’ in tweet no 4 is not addressed in the context of Azaan but the use of loudspeake­rs and amplifiers.”

The petition filed by Aas Mohammad, a resident of Sonepat in Haryana, had sought launching of criminal proceeding­s against Nigam. He claimed that the singer’s tweets violated the Muslim community’s fundamenta­l right to manage religious affairs as enshrined in the Constituti­on, and also hurt the religious sentiments of a section of the population. “I’m not a Muslim, and I have to be woken up by the Azaan in the morning. When will this forced religiousn­ess end in India?” Nigam had tweeted on April 17, creating an uproar among netizens and celebritie­s alike. Later, a fatwa was also issued against the actor.

Referring to various judgments, justice Bedi said the matter of allowing loudspeake­rs for religious purposes had previously been taken up for considerat­ion in the M Veerateswa­ran vs deputy collector case by the Madras high court. The bench, comprising justice K Sampath, had observed that no religion prescribes blaring prayers through sound amplifiers.

“If the contents of the complaint are seen in the context of Section 295-A of the Indian Penal Code (hurting religious sentiments), the words used in the tweet are not meant to insult any religion or religious belief of any class of citizens, and are apparently not deliberate or malicious,” justice Bedi held, adding that the petition was just a cheap way of gaining publicity by making a well-known singer a “scapegoat” in the name of religion.

 ?? HT FILE/HIMANSHU VYAS ?? The bench said the petition against Sonu Nigam was just a cheap way of gaining publicity by making a wellknown singer a ‘scapegoat’ in the name of religion.
HT FILE/HIMANSHU VYAS The bench said the petition against Sonu Nigam was just a cheap way of gaining publicity by making a wellknown singer a ‘scapegoat’ in the name of religion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India