Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Capital ranks sixth in urban governance, Pune tops chart

23CITY SURVEY Bengalurub­ased advocacy group Janaagraha paints a grim picture of Indian cities

- Moushumi Das Gupta moushumi.gupta@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: Pune, Kolkata and Thiruvanan­thapuram topped the charts in urban governance while national capital Delhi was ranked sixth in a 23-city survey conducted by Bengaluru-based advocacy group Janaagraha Centre for Citizenshi­p and Democracy.

The study painted a grim picture of Indian cities, finding a majority of them “grossly underprepa­red” to deliver a high quality of life in the long term. Although Delhi has moved up in rankings as compared to 2016 (when it ranked ninth), on a scale of 10 the city scored below five on two aspects of urban governance – urban capacities and resources of municipali­ties to undertake reform (4.2) as well as transparen­cy, accountabi­lity and participat­ion (3).

The city, however, topped the chart in the urban planning and design category with a score of 5.1.

Financial capital Mumbai’s ranking fell from sixth in 2016 to ninth in 2017 in the fifth edition of the Annual Survey of India’s City Systems-2017 (ASICS-2017).

On a scale of 10, the 23 cities – many of which are part of the government’s flagship smart cities mission — scored between 3 and 5.1 on four key components of governance: urban planning and design; urban capacities and resources; empowered and legitimate political representa­tion; transparen­cy, and accountabi­lity and participat­ion.

This was far behind cities such as London, New York and Johannesbu­rg, which topped global benchmarks with 8.8, 8.8 and 7.6 points respective­ly.

Indian cities also have a lot of catching up to do when it comes to becoming self-reliant. The cities assessed in the study were found to be generating only 39% of the funds they spend on an average, with Patna raising just 17% on its own.

Only Mumbai, Delhi, Hyderabad and Pune generate over 50% of the amount they spend from their own revenue. The study found that in several cities, their own revenues did not even cover staff salaries. “Lack of adequate revenue sources of their own severely constrains the ability of our cities to invest in infrastruc­ture and service delivery,” the report said.

Janaagraha CEO Srikanth Viswanatha­n said the objective of the survey was to measure the preparedne­ss of cities to deliver high quality infrastruc­ture and services in the long term by evaluating “city systems”.

“On a scale of 10, 12 out of 23 cities have scored below four – indicating the precarious situation of our cities. The pace of reforms in India has been painfully slow. Recurring floods, gar- bage crises, air pollution, fire accidents, building collapses and dengue outbreaks are symptoms of this deeper governance crisis in our cities,” he said.

Among the medium cities (with a population of up to one million), Ranchi has broken into the top 10 with a score of 4.1. Bengaluru and Chandigarh (perceived as a planned city) figured at the bottom of the list. “Bengaluru is a poor outlier among mega-cities primarily on account of weak finances,” said Vivek Anandan Nair, associate manager and project lead of ASICS2017.

The survey also found urban capacities across cities suffering from rampant staff vacancies, inadequate domain experience of senior municipal officers, and powerless mayors and councils. Commission­ers were found to

Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai

Bhopal, Chennai, Jaipur, Kanpur, Kolkata

Bhubaneswa­r, Chandigarh, Dehradun, Guwahati, Raipur, Ranchi

have only have 2.7 years of experience in urban management on an average. Average staff vacancy stood at 35%, with Guwahati bottoming out at 60%.

“The mayor and councils in our cities are toothless. They don’t have full decision-making authority over critical functions such as planning, housing, water, environmen­t, fire and emergency services,” the report stated.

Only a few cities, such as Bhopal, Kanpur and Lucknow, have a directly elected mayor with five-year tenure while metros like Bengaluru and Delhi have an indirectly elected mayor with one-year tenure.

The survey went on to state that no city in India has effective policies to deter plan violations, a deficiency that leads to the mushroomin­g of slums and unauthoris­ed colonies. While all its 23 cities scored zero on this parameter, London, New York and Johannesbu­rg notched a perfect 10 out of 10.

Moreover, most of the country’s town and country planning acts date back to the previous century. It has one planner per four lakh citizens (as opposed to 48 in the United States and 148 in the United Kingdom) the study said, pointing out that poor urban planning can cost a country 3% of its GDP.

“Our study once again reiterates the need to fix city governance on a war footing. There will be no change unless the state government empowers municipali­ties. Lack of legislativ­e imaginatio­n and political will has resulted in state government­s not fixing city governance,” Viswanatha­n said.

 ?? VIRENDRA SINGH GOSAIN/HT FILE ?? Recurring floods, garbage crises, air pollution and fire accidents are symptoms of the deeper governance crisis in our cities, the report says.
VIRENDRA SINGH GOSAIN/HT FILE Recurring floods, garbage crises, air pollution and fire accidents are symptoms of the deeper governance crisis in our cities, the report says.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India