CJI removal

“Azad’s office has called us for a meeting. We will discuss a range of issues,” he said.

Azad’s meeting with Naidu is scheduled after this. The office of the vice president confirmed a meeting had been sought and time given for noon on Friday, exactly an hour after the opposition meeting.

A Congress leader, also one of the four cited in the first instance, confirmed that the deliberations are for the purpose of taking forward the motion for the removal of the CJI. When asked whether this will be taken forward, a Rashtriya Janata Dal MP (also one of the four) said, “Your information is correct. Our Congress friends have indicated to us that this will be submitted on Friday.”

The Left parties (both CPM and CPI), Nationalist Congress Party and the Rashtriya Janata Dal are on board the attempt to move the motion, he added. The Trinamul Congress, a key opposition party, has however not signed the motion, said a party leader who asked not to be identified.

The removal motion can be moved even when Parliament is not in session, and requires the signature of 50 Rajya Sabha MPS. HT had reported on April 3 that Congress had already got the signatures of 65 MPS but was waiting for a broader political consensus to be reached before moving it.

Once the motion is moved, the Chair of the House may or may not admit it. If it is admitted, a three member committee is set up to enquire into charges. If it concludes that there is enough reason to remove the CJI, the House in which the motion was first moved takes it up for discussion and a vote. Once it is passed with a special majority (twothirds of the members present and voting) in the house, it goes to the second house. If it is passed in both houses, then the address is presented to the President for the removal of the judge, who then passed an order in this regard.

There has been a clear division within the Congress on the issue.

One section believed that the motion was necessary in the wake of the comments made by four Supreme Court judges at an unprecedented press conference in January about the Chief Justice’s exercise of power as master of the roster and it would serve as a ‘deterrent’. Another section argued that moving such a motion may portray the Congress as ‘anti-judiciary’ and would yield little since they did not have the numbers to see it through in any case.

With the Loya judgement, the arguments of the pro-motion faction within the party got greater weight, said a Congress leader. CJI Misra retires in October. (With inputs from Moushumi Das Gupta)

THE REMOVAL MOTION CAN BE MOVED EVEN WHEN PARLIAMENT IS NOT IN SESSION, AND REQUIRES THE SIGNATURE OF 50 RAJYA SABHA MPS.