Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Battle in US for migratory birds

- (The writer is director, Chintan Environmen­tal Research and Action Group)

tory Bird Treaty Act, 1918, according to a press release of the NRDC.

Basically, the treaty prohibits the taking (which means killing) of migratory birds. What’s changed now is that killing is interprete­d as intentiona­l, not the many tacit industrial killings that could take place.

One example NRDC offers is of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon drilling rig explosion, when the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico killed more than a million birds. BP and several other firms had to pay billions in dollars as fine, which were then used in conservati­on elsewhere.

Under the newly reinterpre­ted law, companies wouldn’t have had to. There won’t be any incentive for any industry to care for birds anymore.

This is an act of shameless theft from the planet. But it’s worse, because it sets the global precedence to undo environmen­tal protection for bio-diversity. Big corporates get teeth to fight for it, and those who battle for tighter laws have less weapons in their armoury.

I hope NRDC and allies win, because then, we’ll be able to show that even in dark times globally, protecting birds was found to be a task important enough to tick off the American President’s understand­ing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India