Oxford report on social media curbs
“A recent BBC study suggested that many Indians feel as though they had a patriotic duty to forward information and that the validation of belief systems often ‘trumps the verification of the facts’.”
Noting that social media was once seen as an enabler of free information, helping citizens to break free from elite gatekeepers such as journalists, the report adds that this may still be true in developed societies, but events last year have shown how different the situation can be in countries like India, the Philippines, Myanmar and Brazil.
“When just a handful of apps provide the main way in which most people access and share information, the risks of misinformation and manipulation increase exponentially. It should be added that much of the manipulation is carried out by domestic political elites running organised, large-scale, and wellfunded campaigns”, it says.
Former Chief Election Commissioner OP Rawat had told HT in October last year that attempts to sway election outcomes by manipulating voters through technological interventions have emerged as the biggest challenge for the electoral process.
In an interview to HT, Rawat said that political leaders had moved from bribing voters with money or freebies to handing out cash to parties seeking the help of big data companies for analysis and targeted communication on social media to spin elections.
“Instead of direct bribing of voters, it is now moving to technology and big data firms and services like targeted communication on social media and analysis on where to focus so as to tilt the voting behaviour in a party’s favour…all these sophisticated techniques, which may cost a bomb, are being resorted to,” Rawat said.
Based on a survey of 200 editors, CEOS, and digital leaders, the University of Oxford report finds that subscription and membership will be the key priority for the news industry going forward. There is also a growing acceptance that some types of quality news provision might need to be subsidised.
The news industry, the report says, is losing patience with Facebook and publishers are re-focusing attention elsewhere. Over three-quarters (78%) of those surveyed think it is important to invest more in Artificial Intelligence to help secure the future of journalism – but not as an alternative to employing more editors.
“This will be the year when the regulation of platform companies starts to bite following growing concern about misinformation, privacy, and market power. Something once considered unthinkable has become ‘inevitable’, in the words of Apple boss Tim Cook – though the details will be messy, hard-fought, and take time to play out”, the report adds.