‘Equitability’ of inequitable pay
US Soccer says the World Cup-winning women’s team has been paid more than their male counterparts
NEWYORK:FACING mounting public pressure in a fight over equitable pay, US Soccer said the World Cup champion women’s national team has been paid more than the men’s team.
According to a letter released on Monday by US Soccer President Carlos Cordeiro, the federation paid out $34.1 million in salary and game bonuses to the women between 2010 and 2018 as opposed to $26.4 million paid to the men. The total does not include the value of benefits received only by the women, like health care.
The federation released the figures as it moves toward mediating a federal lawsuit in which players for the women’s team accused US Soccer of “institutionalised gender discrimination” that includes inequitable compensation when compared to players on the men’s team.
COMPARISON
Comparing compensation between the two teams is difficult because the pay structure is based on different collective bargaining agreements. For example, players for the women’s team have a base salary while the men are paid primarily based on matches and performance.
“In the weeks ahead, we’ll focus on preparing for mediation and resolving this matter in the best interests of the WNT and US Soccer. I want you to know that US Soccer is committed to doing right by our players, and I’ve been encouraged by the public comments from players expressing their desire for a cooperative approach. I remain optimistic that we can find common ground,” Cordeiro wrote. “Together, I believe we can get this done.”
‘SAD ATTEMPT’
Molly Levinson, a spokeswoman for the players in matters involving the lawsuit, called the letter “a sad attempt by USSF to quell the overwhelming tide of support the USWNT has received from everyone from fans to sponsors to the United States Congress.
“The USSF has repeatedly admitted that it does not pay the women equally and that it does not believe the women even deserve to be paid equally,” Levinson said.
“This is why they use words like “fair and equitable,” not equal in describing pay.”
Cordeiro said the federation recently conducted an extensive analysis of its finances over the past 10 years, seeking to clear up what he called confusion based on the pay structures for both teams.
US Soccer said it pays the women’s national team players a base salary of $100,000 per year, and an additional $67,500 to $72,500 per player as a salary for playing in the National Women’s Soccer League.
The women also have health care benefits and a retirement plan.
Players on the men’s national team are paid by training camp call-ups, game appearances and through performance bonuses. The federation acknowledged the men have the ability to earn higher bonuses than the women.
The men’s team did not make the field for the 2018 World Cup in Russia, while the women have won back-to-back World Cup titles.
The collective bargaining agreements are not made public, and US Soccer did not provide details about the men’s bonus structure.
USSF also says the men’s team generates more revenue. The women’s team generated $101.3 million over the course of 238 games between 2009 and 2019 while the men generated $185.7 million over 191 games, according to the federation.
The analysis did not include prize money for tournaments like the World Cup, because those funds are determined by FIFA, soccer’s international governing body, and not US Soccer.
The letter comes amid increasing pressure on US Soccer in the wake of the women’s victory at the World Cup earlier this month. After the United States defeated the Netherlands in Lyon, France, the crowd at the stadium chanted “Equal Pay! Equal Pay!”
During the World Cup, more than 50 members of Congress also sent a letter to US Soccer “to express our disappointment of the inequities in pay, publicity, and investment that the US Women’s National Team (USWNT) has continued to face.”
Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia introduced a bill that would withhold federal funding that would go toward hosting the 2026 men’s World Cup until the issue was resolved.
Procter & Gamble, a sponsor of the team, said this month it would donate $529,000—$23,000 for each of the 23 players on the US team that won the World Cup—to the US Women’s National Team Players Association to help close the pay gap. The company took out a fullpage ad in The New York Times urging US Soccer to “be on the right side of history”.
Cordeiro said in the letter that the federation decided to focus on winning the World Cup rather than debate the lawsuit.
“Now that the Women’s World Cup is behind us, a common understanding of key facts will also help advance our shared work to grow women’s soccer in America as well as the larger national discussion about equality,” he wrote.
Levinson maintains the figures provided by US Soccer are misleading.
“The USSF fact sheet is not a ‘clarification’. It is a ruse. Here is what they cannot deny. For every game a man plays on the MNT he makes a higher base salary payment than a woman on the WNT. For every comparable win or tie, his bonus is higher. That is the very definition of gender discrimination,” Levinson said in a statement. “For the USSF to believe otherwise, is disheartening but it only increases our determination to obtain true equal pay.” The World Aquatics Championships ended last Sunday in Gwangju, South Korea. Many records were broken and golds won,and the US finished on top of the medals tally. But is the US really dominating aquatics like they used to? Of the 76 events at the World Championships, only 49 will be contested at next year’s Olympics. Isolate these 49 events, and you have a new leader: China.
The Chinese won 12 golds to the USA'S 11 in these Olympic categories. If we compare this with the number of golds won at the Rio Olympics—17—it’s an even more significant drop for the US. If the US and China replicate their World Championships performance at the 2020 Olympics, China will overtake the giants for the first time in aquatics.