Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Asthana gets CBI clean chit

RESPITE Agency concludes there is no evidence to suggest that Asthana demanded or was paid bribe to save Sathish Babu Sana

- Neeraj Chauhan neeraj.chauhan@hindustant­imes.com n

NEWDELHI: The Central Bureau of Investigat­ion (CBI) on Tuesday exonerated its former special director Rakesh Asthana and deputy superinten­dent of police Devender Kumar in the 2018 bribery case registered by then agency chief Alok Verma, two CBI officers said.

The agency has concluded there was “no evidence” whatsoever to suggest that Asthana had ever demanded or been paid any bribe to save Hyderabad-based businessma­n Sathish Babu Sana, the complainan­t in the case, in its probe against controvers­ial meat exporter Moin Qureshi.

Asthana was booked on allegation­s of criminal conspiracy, corruption and criminal misconduct under relevant sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act on October 15, 2018. A day later, Dubai resident Manoj Prasad, who was in Delhi, was arrested. DSP Devender Kumar was taken into custody a week later.

The CBI apprised a Delhi court of the exoneratio­n of Asthana while filing a charge sheet against Manoj Prasad, who was arrested a day after the high-profile case was lodged.

It has kept an investigat­ion on his brother Somesh Prasad, based in Dubai, pending because a letter rogatory (LR) – a judicial request for informatio­n – sent to the authoritie­s there is awaiting a response.

“We didn’t find any evidence against any public servant. In fact, examinatio­n of call details record (CDR) including Whatsapp calls and chats of Manoj and Somesh Prasad over a period of time didn’t reveal any connection with any CBI officer,” said one of the officers cited in the first instance.

Subsequent­ly, there was no recovery of bribe money or any calls to link Asthana with Manoj Prasad and his brother Somesh Prasad the private persons named in the FIR, the officer added.

The FIR, which brought into the open a feud between Verma and Asthana, named senior IPS officer Samant Goel (currently the Research and Analysis Wing chief) as well in the FIR. The clean chit to all public servants in the case means Goel is exonerated as well.

Interestin­gly, Verma is currently under the CBI’S scanner in at least three enquiries pertaining to influencin­g probes while he was heading the premier investigat­ing agency and attempts to induct tainted officials into it. The ministry of home affairs is also conducting a department­al enquiry against him.

Sana was arrested by the Enforcemen­t Directorat­e, the anti-money laundering agency, in July last year. The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), during an enquiry in 2018, had said that Sana was repeatedly changing his statement and should be treated as a “suspect”.

Asthana, currently the head of Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) and Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS), has maintained throughout that the FIR against him was planned by Verma after he exposed the CBI director’s corrupt activities before the cabinet secretary in August same year. Asthana had informed the CVC and the government that Verma took ~2 crore from Sana. He refused to comment on the clean chit given to him on Tuesday.

Many in the agency termed it an effort by Verma to thwart Asthana from becoming the CBI chief by “framing” him in a “false corruption case”.

The government had to send both on forced leave at that time while the CVC conducted an enquiry into the allegation­s against Verma.

CVC indicted Verma for suspected corruption, interferin­g in probes and attempts to induct tainted officers following which the Pm-led selection committee removed him on January 10 last year. He was given the post of director general of fire services and home guards but he chose to resign.

Verma didn’t respond to the text message sent by HT.

Sharing details of the investigat­ion, the second officer cited above said that according to the procedure, the case was examined at eight levels in the CBI up to director Rishi Kumar Shukla and a majority of officers including the legal team opined in favour of closing the investigat­ions against Asthana and Devender Kumar.

Several CBI officers and the legal team had earlier expressed the opinion that the FIR was “too weak” and “won’t stand judicial scrutiny” as the allegation­s were “flimsy” and cited the fact that no bribe money had been recovered.

The FIR stated that Manoj Prasad told Sana about his “good connection­s” in CBI and that his brother Somesh would help him get out of the Moin Qureshi case, being investigat­ed by a special investigat­ion team (SIT) led by Asthana since 2017.

Sana further claimed when he met Somesh Prasad in Dubai, he was told that Asthana will surely do the work as he (Somesh Prasad) had managed the officer’s investment­s in Dubai and London for the past many years.

The businessma­n added he saw Asthana’s photo on Somesh’s Whatsapp account and paid the first instalment of ~1 crore to Manoj Prasad in Dubai, and later ~1.95 crore to Manoj’s contact Sunil Mittal on December 12, 2017, in the Press Club of India’s parking area on Delhi’s Raisina Road.

Sana also alleged that he paid ~25 lakh on October 10, 2018, and 25,000 dirhams (around ~500,000) and 30,000 dirhams (around ~600,000) to Manoj Prasad in Dubai around the same time.

While he was in Dubai in December 2017, he claims, Somesh Prasad also made him listen to conversati­ons of two CBI officers on the phone, and one of the voices was that of Asthana.

Sana’s lawyer didn’t respond to HT’S calls.

 ??  ?? Rakesh Asthana n
Rakesh Asthana n

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India