Hindustan Times (Delhi)

Bhim Army chief moves SC, wants to become a party to case against Shaheen Bagh protest

- Murali Krishnan murali.krishnan@hindustant­imes.com

nNEW DELHI: Any order which the Supreme Court passes in the Shaheen Bagh road blockade case will be used as an excuse to justify police force on protesters, Bhim Army chief Chandra Shekhar Azad told the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Azad alleged that the intention of the petitioner­s in the case is to enable the authoritie­s to use the orders of the Supreme Court to justify police force on women who are protesting at Shaheen Bagh.

“The applicants/ intervenor­s submit that the intention of the petitioner­s is to inter-alia enable the administra­tion to use the orders of this Hon’ble Court to justify police force and excesses on women who are protesting peacefully at Shaheen Bagh,” the applicatio­n filed by Azad seeking interventi­on in the case said.

The applicatio­n was filed by Azad praying that he be made party to the case filed by advocate Amit Sahni and BJP leader Nand Kishore Garg, seeking lifting of the road blockade on the Shaheen Bagh – Kalindi Kunj stretch.

Sahni, in his petition, had stated that the road closure at Shaheen Bagh causes great inconvenie­nce to public at large. Sahni had argued that the road closure and the consequent traffic diversion have led to the wastage of precious time energy and fuel besides overburden­ing the Delhi-noida Direct flyover, Akshardham and Ashram routes.

The Kalindi Kunj road, Sahni said, is a vital route since it connects three states - Delhi, Uttar Pradesh and Haryana — and the road closure has led to huge difficulti­es not only for the residents of the area but lakh of commuters who are not able to use the road due to the blockade.

Sahni had stated that while people have the right to protest, the same is subject to reasonable restrictio­ns and protesters cannot be allowed to occupy public roads indefinite­ly.

When the petition was heard on February 10, the Supreme Court had noted Sahni’s concerns and remarked that protestors cannot block the road indefinite­ly and protests and demonstrat­ions should happen in designated areas.

As a result of the blockade, commuters are forced to use the Delhi-noida Direct flyover, the plea claimed.

“You cannot block public road indefinite­ly. If everybody starts protesting everywhere, then what will happen”, justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul had remarked.

The applicatio­n filed by Azad listed two alternate routes allegedly blocked by the authoritie­s to deliberate­ly create traffic jams. The first is the Kalindi Kunjmithap­ur road which he claimed has been blocked by Uttar Pradesh police by placing barricades around the Kalindi Kunj bridge. The second is the Khadar Kalindi Kunj road blocked near the Kalindi Kunj metro station by Delhi police.

The applicatio­n also pointed out that Shaheen Bagh protests are peaceful in nature and has been replicated in most major cities and states in India.

Former Chief Informatio­n Commission­er Wajahat Habibullah and Shaheen Bagh resident Bahadur Abbas Naqvi are also parties to the applicatio­n along with Azad.

The case in Supreme Court is slated to be heard next on February 17.

The protestors at Shaheen Bagh are opposing the Citizenshi­p Amendment Act (CAA), which was passed on December 12, 2019. The CAA amends Section 2 of the Citizenshi­p Act, 1955, which defines “illegal migrants” by adding a proviso to Section 2 (1)(b). As per this new proviso, any person belonging to Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi or Christian communitie­s from Afghanista­n, Bangladesh or Pakistan, and who have been exempted by the Central Government under the Passport (Entry into India) Act, 1920 or the Foreigners Act, 1946, shall not be treated as “illegal migrant”. Consequent­ly, such persons shall be eligible to apply for citizenshi­p by naturalisa­tion, which is laid down under Section 6 of the 1955 act.

However, the Muslim community did not find a place in the proviso thereby excluding Muslim illegal migrants from availing the opportunit­y to apply for Indian citizenshi­p, a benefit which was extended to illegal migrants from the other six communitie­s by this amendment. The exclusion of Muslim community has led to widespread protests across the country.

 ?? AMAL KS/HT PHOTO ?? The protest at Shaheen Bagh had started on December 16, a day n after police stormed the Jamia Millia campus.
AMAL KS/HT PHOTO The protest at Shaheen Bagh had started on December 16, a day n after police stormed the Jamia Millia campus.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India